Have you read the BDFL's Python Optional Typechecking Redux ?
Yes.
(http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=89161)
It's usage of adapt assumes that a class is a protocol, so I
guess that it does not work with the new version of PEP 246.
Why not? There's nothing wrong with
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
S?bastien Boisg?rault wrote:
[snip]
Agreed. Consistency matters. But precisely because Python looks in
the type of the object (and not the object itself), I don't need to
explicitely check the type myself: the code adapt =
getattr(protocol, '__adapt__') will find
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Magnus Lie Hetland) wrote in message news:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]...
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a look at the new reference implementation of PEP 246
(Object Adaptation) and I feel uneasy with one specific point
of this new version. I don't
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a look at the new reference implementation of PEP 246
(Object Adaptation) and I feel uneasy with one specific point
of this new version. I don't fully understand why it checks
if *the type of* the protocol has a method __adapt__:
