Re: Paste and WSGI 2.0 [WAS: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks]

2007-10-15 Thread Ian Bicking
On Oct 14, 3:46 am, Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we do agree entirely, it is just that the application we have > in > mind is more a collection of web services than a traditional Web > application. > Now, since you are here, there is an unrelated question that I want to >

Re: Paste and WSGI 2.0 [WAS: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks]

2007-10-14 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On Oct 14, 6:46 pm, Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, since you are here, there is an unrelated question that I want to > ask you, concerning the future of Paste with respect to WSGI 2.0. > I do realize that at this stage WSGI 2.0, is only a draft Hmmm, not sure where people keep

Paste and WSGI 2.0 [WAS: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks]

2007-10-14 Thread Michele Simionato
On Oct 14, 2:52 am, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That said, going without a framework (which at least in his article is > what Michele seems to be comparing Pylons against) isn't always so > bad. I started writing an Atompub server in Pylons, but felt like I > was spending too much tim