On 12/9/2013 3:36 PM, Logan Collins wrote:
Just checking whether 1) a PEP is the proper place for this
No, not needed. If, after discussion here (or python-ideas), such a
change would only need a tracker issue.
and 2) what y'all think about it.
I would like to propose a change to the the
On 09/12/2013 20:36, Logan Collins wrote:
Just checking whether 1) a PEP is the proper place for this and 2) what
y'all think about it.
I would like to propose a change to the the 're' standard library to
support iterables.
So, something like the following would work:
import re
text = """hello
On 2013-12-09 14:36, Logan Collins wrote:
> Just checking whether 1) a PEP is the proper place for this and 2)
> what y'all think about it.
>
> I would like to propose a change to the the 're' standard library to
> support iterables.
>
> So, something like the following would work:
>
> import re
Just checking whether 1) a PEP is the proper place for this and 2) what
y'all think about it.
I would like to propose a change to the the 're' standard library to
support iterables.
So, something like the following would work:
import re
text = """hello user
hello user
hello user"""
users = ["Bo
