Mike Kent wrote:
To followup on this:
Terry: Yes, I did in fact miss the 'buffer' parameter to open.
Setting the buffer parameter to 0 did in fact fix the test code that I
gave above, but oddly, did not fix my actual production code; it
continues to get the data as first read, rather than what i
Mike Kent wrote:
> To followup on this:
>
> Terry: Yes, I did in fact miss the 'buffer' parameter to open.
> Setting the buffer parameter to 0 did in fact fix the test code that I
> gave above, but oddly, did not fix my actual production code; it
> continues to get the data as first read, rather
On 2008-10-22 23:00, kdwyer wrote:
> On 22 Oct, 19:54, Mike Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Before I file a bug report against Python 2.5.2, I want to run this by
>> the newsgroup to make sure I'm not being stupid.
>>
>> I have a text file of fixed-length records I want to read in random
>> orde
On Oct 23, 9:48 am, Mike Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To followup on this:
>
> Terry: Yes, I did in fact miss the 'buffer' parameter to open.
> Setting the buffer parameter to 0 did in fact fix the test code that I
> gave above, but oddly, did not fix my actual production code; it
> continues
To followup on this:
Terry: Yes, I did in fact miss the 'buffer' parameter to open.
Setting the buffer parameter to 0 did in fact fix the test code that I
gave above, but oddly, did not fix my actual production code; it
continues to get the data as first read, rather than what is currently
on the
On Oct 22, 2:54 pm, Mike Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before I file a bug report against Python 2.5.2, I want to run this by
> the newsgroup to make sure I'm not being stupid.
>
> I have a text file of fixed-length records I want to read in random
> order. That file is being changed in real-t
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:59:45 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
Mike Kent wrote:
Before I file a bug report against Python 2.5.2, I want to run this by
the newsgroup to make sure I'm not [missing something].
Good idea ;-). What you are missing is a rereading of the fine manua
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:59:45 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Mike Kent wrote:
>> Before I file a bug report against Python 2.5.2, I want to run this by
>> the newsgroup to make sure I'm not [missing something].
>
> Good idea ;-). What you are missing is a rereading of the fine manual
> to see what y
On 22 Oct, 19:54, Mike Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before I file a bug report against Python 2.5.2, I want to run this by
> the newsgroup to make sure I'm not being stupid.
>
> I have a text file of fixed-length records I want to read in random
> order. That file is being changed in real-tim
Mike Kent wrote:
Before I file a bug report against Python 2.5.2, I want to run this by
the newsgroup to make sure I'm not [missing something].
Good idea ;-). What you are missing is a rereading of the fine manual
to see what you missed the first time. I recommend this *whenever* you
are ha
On Oct 22, 3:44 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2:54 pm, Mike Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Before I file a bug report against Python 2.5.2, I want to run this by
> > the newsgroup to make sure I'm not being stupid.
>
> > I have a text file of fixed-length records I want to re
On Oct 22, 2:54 pm, Mike Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before I file a bug report against Python 2.5.2, I want to run this by
> the newsgroup to make sure I'm not being stupid.
>
> I have a text file of fixed-length records I want to read in random
> order. That file is being changed in real-t
Before I file a bug report against Python 2.5.2, I want to run this by
the newsgroup to make sure I'm not being stupid.
I have a text file of fixed-length records I want to read in random
order. That file is being changed in real-time by another process,
and my process want to see the changes to
13 matches
Mail list logo
