Chris Mellon wrote:
On 22 Feb 2007 11:28:52 -0800, Andy Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 22, 10:53 am, a bunch of folks wrote:
Memory is basically free.
This is true if you are simply scanning a file into memory. However,
I'm storing the contents in some in-memory data structures and
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andy Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
If I could have a heap that is larger and does not need to be
dynamically extended, then the Python GC could work more efficiently.
...
GC! If you're allocating lots of objects and holding on to them, GC
will run
I have an application that scans and processes a bunch of text files.
The content I'm pulling out and holding in memory is at least 200MB.
I'd love to be able to tell the CPython virtual machine that I need a
heap of, say 300MB up front rather than have it grow as needed. I've
had a scan
Andy Watson wrote:
I have an application that scans and processes a bunch of text files.
The content I'm pulling out and holding in memory is at least 200MB.
I'd love to be able to tell the CPython virtual machine that I need a
heap of, say 300MB up front rather than have it grow as needed.
Why do you want that? And no, it is not possible. And to be honest:
I have
no idea why e.g. the JVM allows for this.
Diez
The reason why is simply that I know roughly how much memory I'm going
to need, and cpython seems to be taking a fair amount of time
extending its heap as I read in
Andy Watson wrote:
Why do you want that? And no, it is not possible. And to be honest:
I have
no idea why e.g. the JVM allows for this.
The reason why is simply that I know roughly how much memory I'm going
to need, and cpython seems to be taking a fair amount of time
extending its heap
Andy Watson wrote:
Why do you want that? And no, it is not possible. And to be honest:
I have
no idea why e.g. the JVM allows for this.
Diez
The reason why is simply that I know roughly how much memory I'm going
to need, and cpython seems to be taking a fair amount of time
On 22 Feb 2007 09:52:49 -0800, Andy Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you want that? And no, it is not possible. And to be honest:
I have
no idea why e.g. the JVM allows for this.
Diez
The reason why is simply that I know roughly how much memory I'm going
to need, and cpython
Andy Watson kirjoitti:
I have an application that scans and processes a bunch of text files.
The content I'm pulling out and holding in memory is at least 200MB.
I'd love to be able to tell the CPython virtual machine that I need a
heap of, say 300MB up front rather than have it grow as
On Feb 22, 10:53 am, a bunch of folks wrote:
Memory is basically free.
This is true if you are simply scanning a file into memory. However,
I'm storing the contents in some in-memory data structures and doing
some data manipulation. This is my speculation:
Several small objects per scanned
On 22 Feb 2007 11:28:52 -0800, Andy Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 22, 10:53 am, a bunch of folks wrote:
Memory is basically free.
This is true if you are simply scanning a file into memory. However,
I'm storing the contents in some in-memory data structures and doing
some data
Andy Watson schrieb:
I have an application that scans and processes a bunch of text files.
The content I'm pulling out and holding in memory is at least 200MB.
I'd love to be able to tell the CPython virtual machine that I need a
heap of, say 300MB up front rather than have it grow as
12 matches
Mail list logo
