On 19/12/12 18:11:37, Kwnstantinos Euaggelidis wrote:
> I have this code for Prime Numbers and i want to do it with Threads..
> Any idea.??
Why would you want to do that?
It's not going to be any faster, since your code is CPU-bound.
You may have several CPUs, but CPython is going to use only one
On 12/19/2012 12:11 PM, Kwnstantinos Euaggelidis wrote:
> I have this code for Prime Numbers and i want to do it with Threads.. Any
> idea.??
Why do you want to do it with threads? Is it to speed up the
processing? (Guessing that partly because of your printing "elapsed
time." Chances are runni
I have this code for Prime Numbers and i want to do it with Threads.. Any
idea.??
# prime numbers are only divisible by unity and themselves
# (1 is not considered a prime number by convention)
import time
def isprime(n):
if n == 2:
return 1
if n % 2 == 0:
return 0
max
Yes
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:56 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 7:56 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > En Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:46:48 -0200, Manikandan R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hai,
> >
> > > Is it possible to share a single varia
On Feb 26, 7:56 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> En Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:46:48 -0200, Manikandan R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> escribió:
>
> > Hai,
>
> > Is it possible to share a single variable between multiple
> > threads. For eg:
>
> > Class A:
> > thread_init(
En Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:46:48 -0200, Manikandan R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> Hai,
>
> Is it possible to share a single variable between multiple
> threads. For eg:
>
> Class A:
> thread_init()
>
>def run():
> fun1()
>
> def fun():
> assume s
Hai,
Is it possible to share a single variable between multiple
threads. For eg:
Class A:
thread_init()
def run():
fun1()
def fun():
assume some arithmatic operation is going on according to the
input given and each fun will *give different outp
Hai,
Is it possible to share a single variable between multiple
threads. For eg:
Class A:
thread_init()
def run():
fun1()
def fun():
assume some arithmatic operation is going on according to the
input given and each fun will *give different outp
Negoescu Constantin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I know that Python is */not fully threadsafe/*. Unlike Java, where
> threading was considered to be so important that it is a part of the
> syntax, in Python threads were laid down at the altar of Portability.
> But, i really have to finish a projec
Hello.
I know that Python is not fully threadsafe.
Unlike Java, where threading was considered to be so important that it is a part
of the syntax, in Python threads were laid down at the altar of Portability.
But, i really have to finish a project which uses multiple threads in
Python
Stephan Popp wrote:
> I've got a problem with stopping python-threads.
> I'm starting a thread with twisteds reactor.deferToThread which start a
> methodcall in a seperate thread. In this thread a swig-wrapped c++ module is
> running.
> Now I want to stop the running thread from the main thread
You cannot really do that*. Use a flag or something that the thread
checks if it should shut down.
/Simon
* well actually you can, sort of by using
int PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc( long id, PyObject *exc) from C API.
However, if you do that you swap one problem for a sh*tload of others,
because of
Hi all,
I've got a problem with stopping python-threads.
I'm starting a thread with twisteds reactor.deferToThread which start a
methodcall in a seperate thread. In this thread a swig-wrapped c++ module is
running.
Now I want to stop the running thread from the main thread or another one, and
h
13 matches
Mail list logo