szr wrote:
Jürgen Exner wrote:
Andrew Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[Subject: Python's doc problems: sort]
I want to emphasize a point here, as i have done quite emphatically
in the past. The Python documentation, is the world's worst
technical
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, in last week, that page is fetched 550 times.
The second most popular page, trails quite a distance. Here's the top
yup that was me, i have access to a couple of machines and wanted to
test some
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want to emphasize a point here, as i have done quite emphatically in
the past. The Python documentation, is the world's worst technical
writing. As far as technical writing goes, it is even worse than
Perl's in my opinion.
I think
Andrew Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[Subject: Python's doc problems: sort]
I want to emphasize a point here, as i have done quite emphatically in
the past. The Python documentation, is the world's worst technical
And WTF does Python documentation have
Jürgen Exner wrote:
Andrew Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[Subject: Python's doc problems: sort]
I want to emphasize a point here, as i have done quite emphatically
in the past. The Python documentation, is the world's worst
technical
And WTF does
On May 21, 8:53 am, Xah Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The complaint about python doc has turned up
now and then in the past few years it seems, but always got put down
by python priests
No, what was generally rejected was the idea that *you* could bring
more clarity to the documentation, based
alex23 wrote:
«No, what was generally rejected was the idea that *you* could bring
more clarity to the documentation, based on the complete absence of it
in your posts essays. Basically, noone wanted docs that would
randomly degenerate into ad hominem accusations of elitism aimed at
the module
On May 22, 2:28 am, Xah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
«No, what was generally rejected was the idea that *you* could bring
more clarity to the documentation, based on the complete absence of it
in your posts essays. Basically, noone wanted docs that would
randomly degenerate into ad hominem
I offer the python community complete rewrite of the Python doc. The
resulting doc would be one of the best technical writing among Open
Source community's documentations. (a fair verification can be
obtained by polling professional writers and editor community, e.g.
staff writers of Time Mag or
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:48:39 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Python priests: go fuck yourselfs.
In case you have something useful to add, grap the documentation sources
of Python 2.6 (they were converted from LaTeX to reST now) and send a
patch to the documentation maintainers. Lamenting
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:35:10 +0200, John Thingstad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
På Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:26:31 +0200, skrev George Sakkis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
\|||/
(o o)
,ooO--(_)---.
| Please|
| don't feed the |
| TROLL's ! |
På Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:26:31 +0200, skrev George Sakkis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Apr 29, 11:13 pm, Jürgen Exner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this self-promoting maniac still going at it?
Although i disliked Perl very much [...]
Then why on earth do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this self-promoting maniac still going at it?
Although i disliked Perl very much [...]
Then why on earth do you bother polluting this NG?
Back into the killfile you go
jue
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Apr 29, 11:13 pm, Jürgen Exner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this self-promoting maniac still going at it?
Although i disliked Perl very much [...]
Then why on earth do you bother polluting this NG?
Back into the killfile you go
jue
14 matches
Mail list logo
