Re: Python 2.5 Quick Reference

2007-02-03 Thread Peter Otten
Dick Moores wrote: > At 04:02 AM 2/3/2007, Robin Becker wrote: >>Dick Moores wrote: >> > >> > Is this reliable? (Looks good to me, but...) >> > >>. >> >>I really like these for a good overview > > So it looks accurate? After perusing it, I dare say t

Re: Python 2.5 Quick Reference

2007-02-03 Thread skip
Dick> Respondent> I really like these for a good overview Dick> So it looks accurate? He's been doing it awhile: http://rgruet.free.fr/ I think he's got the drill down pretty well by now... ;-) Skip -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/l

Re: Python 2.5 Quick Reference

2007-02-03 Thread Dick Moores
At 04:02 AM 2/3/2007, Robin Becker wrote: >Dick Moores wrote: > > > > Is this reliable? (Looks good to me, but...) > > >. > >I really like these for a good overview So it looks accurate? Dick Moores -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-

Re: Python 2.5 Quick Reference

2007-02-03 Thread Robin Becker
Dick Moores wrote: > > Is this reliable? (Looks good to me, but...) > . I really like these for a good overview -- Robin Becker -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Python 2.5 Quick Reference

2007-02-03 Thread Dick Moores
Is this reliable? (Looks good to me, but...) Thanks, Dick Moores -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list