Scott David Daniels wrote:
Tim Golden wrote:
Scott David Daniels wrote:
Tim Golden wrote:
... Anyhow, at the end I have a working Python 2.7a0 running
under Windows.
Do you mean 3.1a0? As far as I know, 2.7a0 requires the use
of the time machine, as it is expected to be 3 months out.
If yo
Tim Golden wrote:
Scott David Daniels wrote:
Tim Golden wrote:
... Anyhow, at the end I have a working Python 2.7a0 running
under Windows.
Do you mean 3.1a0? As far as I know, 2.7a0 requires the use
of the time machine, as it is expected to be 3 months out.
If you do get an installer built,
Scott David Daniels wrote:
Tim Golden wrote:
... Anyhow, at the end I have a working Python 2.7a0 running
under Windows.
Do you mean 3.1a0? As far as I know, 2.7a0 requires the use
of the time machine, as it is expected to be 3 months out.
If you do get an installer built, even having a semi