On Mar 17, 7:26 pm, Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ninereeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Is the PEP238 change to division going into Python 3 as planned?
IDLE 3.0a3 1/2
0.5
| I realise that the new integer division semantics have been available
| in
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 04:47:49 -0700, Ninereeds wrote:
On Mar 17, 7:26 pm, Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.6, I have read, have optional 'Py3' warnings, and a 2to3 conversion
program
The tools can work out the *intent* of any particular division
operator? Can work out whether the
Ninereeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On Mar 17, 7:26 pm, Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Ninereeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
|
|
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | Is the PEP238 change to division going into Python 3 as planned?
|
| IDLE 3.0a3 1/2
Ninereeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On Mar 17, 7:26 pm, Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Ninereeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
|
|
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | Is the PEP238 change to division going into Python 3 as planned?
|
| IDLE 3.0a3 1/2
Is the PEP238 change to division going into Python 3 as planned?
I realise that the new integer division semantics have been available
in from __future__ for quite a few years now, but a warning might be
appropriate now that Python 3 is in alpha. A lot of people have
probably either forgotten, or
Ninereeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Is the PEP238 change to division going into Python 3 as planned?
IDLE 3.0a3
1/2
0.5
| I realise that the new integer division semantics have been available
| in from __future__ for quite a few years now, but a warning might
