fuzzylollipop wrote:
> there are lots of things you can't do or can't do easily or can't do at
> efficiently in Apache using python as cgi or as anyone would more
> likely assume mod_python. anything that requires any shared state or
> shared resources in Apache is next to impossible. Doing similar
there are lots of things you can't do or can't do easily or can't do at
efficiently in Apache using python as cgi or as anyone would more
likely assume mod_python. anything that requires any shared state or
shared resources in Apache is next to impossible. Doing similar things
in an app server or n
"mojosam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this advice accurate? Are there other things to consider? Isn't
> there just some way (short of running something like Zope) that would
> keep Python resident in the server's RAM? This is a shared server, so
> the web host probably doesn't like stuff si
On 1 Jan 2006 14:44:07 -0800, mojosam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I guess I'm a little confused, and this certainly comes from not yet
>having tried to do anything with Python on a web server.
>
>I remarked once to a Python programmer that it appeared to me that if I
>had a web page that called a P
I guess I'm a little confused, and this certainly comes from not yet
having tried to do anything with Python on a web server.
I remarked once to a Python programmer that it appeared to me that if I
had a web page that called a Python program, that the server would:
1. Load Python
2. Run the progra
> as great as mod_python is, there are lots of restrictions and
> limitations to what youc an do with it because of limitations of apache
> itself, and I am refereing to apache 2.x as well as 1.x, like others
> are saying if you don't need apache specific things it will just be one
> more thing to
as great as mod_python is, there are lots of restrictions and
limitations to what youc an do with it because of limitations of apache
itself, and I am refereing to apache 2.x as well as 1.x, like others
are saying if you don't need apache specific things it will just be one
more thing to work aroun
Matt Helm wrote:
>
> I am starting the design phase of a large project (ERP) where the
> backend will mostly be Python (or Ruby) providing web services.
>
> In this type of usage, is there any benenfit to running under Apache
> as opposed to a pure Python solution using Medusa, TwistedMatrix, or
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Running under Apache is nice if you need other apache services like
> proxying, mod_rewrite, some of the accelerated static file serving
> plugins, etc.
Not needed, this is web services only. That is, Apache is needed, but
only to handle the PHP consumers of the web
Matt Helm wrote:
> I am starting the design phase of a large project (ERP) where the
> backend will mostly be Python (or Ruby) providing web services.
>
> In this type of usage, is there any benenfit to running under Apache
> as opposed to a pure Python solution using Medusa, TwistedMatrix, or
> th
I am starting the design phase of a large project (ERP) where the
backend will mostly be Python (or Ruby) providing web services.
In this type of usage, is there any benenfit to running under Apache
as opposed to a pure Python solution using Medusa, TwistedMatrix, or
the like?
Thanks,
Matt
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
