On 11/02/2021 03.51, James Lu wrote:
> Directly removing the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) would break a lot
> of libraries that implicitly assume it is there. What if Python had
> "realms" that each had separate GILs?
>
> The "realms" (not sure if "subinterpreter" is the correct term here)
> coul
On 10Feb2021 21:51, James Lu wrote:
>Directly removing the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) would break a lot
>of libraries that implicitly assume it is there. What if Python had
>"realms" that each had separate GILs?
>
>The "realms" (not sure if "subinterpreter" is the correct term here)
>could shar
Directly removing the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) would break a lot
of libraries that implicitly assume it is there. What if Python had
"realms" that each had separate GILs?
The "realms" (not sure if "subinterpreter" is the correct term here)
could share objects.
--
https://mail.python.org/mail
