Fouff wrote:
> I have a small question concerning the functions open(...) and file(...)
> with python 2.4
>> The intent is for open() to continue to be preferred for use as a factory
>> function which returns a new file object.
versus
>> The previous spelling, open(), is retained for compatibil
Hello all.
I have a small question concerning the functions open(...) and file(...)
with python 2.4
In the online version of the documentation in the build-in functions
(section 2.1 http://docs.python.org/lib/built-in-funcs.html) here is an
quote of the file(...) doc :
The file() constructor is
