In article 58f61382-ac79-46fb-8612-a3c9fde29...@c16g2000yqd.googlegroups.com,
Veloz michaelve...@gmail.com wrote:
The peek parts comes in when the user comes back later to see if
their report has done. That is, in my page controller logic, I'd like
to look through the complete queue and see if
Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
I was just wondering if
other people ever missed the q.put_at_front_of_queue() method or if
it is just me.
Sounds like you don't want a queue, but a stack. Or
maybe a double-ended queue.
--
Greg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mar 3, 1:14 am, Gregory Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
MRAB wrote:
I suppose it depends on the complexity of the data structure. A dict's
methods are threadsafe, for example, but if you have a data structure
where access leads to multiple method calls then collectively they
Veloz wrote:
On Mar 3, 1:14 am, Gregory Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
MRAB wrote:
I suppose it depends on the complexity of the data structure. A dict's
methods are threadsafe, for example, but if you have a data structure
where access leads to multiple method calls then
Veloz wrote:
Unless I missed where you guys were going, I think we got off the main
point. The main question at hand was this: what's the best way (heck,
any way) to implement a sort of peek whereby a number of processes
can write results to some common object and some other process can
peek
On Mar 2, 6:18 pm, Raymond Hettinger pyt...@rcn.com wrote:
On Mar 2, 8:29 am, Veloz michaelve...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I'm looking for a queue that I can use with multiprocessing, which has
a peek method.
I've seen some discussion about queue.peek but don't see anything in
the docs
Hi all
I'm looking for a queue that I can use with multiprocessing, which has
a peek method.
I've seen some discussion about queue.peek but don't see anything in
the docs about it.
Does python have a queue class with peek semantics?
Michael
--
On Mar 2, 8:29 am, Veloz michaelve...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I'm looking for a queue that I can use with multiprocessing, which has
a peek method.
I've seen some discussion about queue.peek but don't see anything in
the docs about it.
Does python have a queue class with peek semantics?
On Mar 2, 1:18 pm, Raymond Hettinger pyt...@rcn.com wrote:
On Mar 2, 8:29 am, Veloz michaelve...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I'm looking for a queue that I can use with multiprocessing, which has
a peek method.
I've seen some discussion about queue.peek but don't see anything in
the docs
Veloz wrote:
On Mar 2, 1:18 pm, Raymond Hettinger pyt...@rcn.com wrote:
On Mar 2, 8:29 am, Veloz michaelve...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I'm looking for a queue that I can use with multiprocessing, which has
a peek method.
I've seen some discussion about queue.peek but don't see anything in
the
On 03/02/10 19:44, MRAB wrote:
cut
information, such as when it was completed, the status (OK or failed),
etc. You might want to wrap it in a class with locks (mutexes) to ensure
it's threadsafe.
What actually happens if multiple threads at the same time, write to a
shared dictionary (Not using
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Martin P. Hellwig
martin.hell...@dcuktec.org wrote:
What actually happens if multiple threads at the same time, write to a
shared dictionary (Not using the same key)?
All of Python's built-in types are thread safe. Both updates will happen.
--
Daniel
Daniel Stutzbach wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Martin P. Hellwig
martin.hell...@dcuktec.org mailto:martin.hell...@dcuktec.org wrote:
What actually happens if multiple threads at the same time, write to
a shared dictionary (Not using the same key)?
All of Python's built-in
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 22:54 +0100, mk wrote:
snip
No need to use synchro primitives like locks?
I know that it may work, but that strikes me as somehow wrong... I'm
used to using things like Lock().acquire() and Lock().release() when
accessing shared data structures, whatever they are.
John Krukoff wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 22:54 +0100, mk wrote:
snip
No need to use synchro primitives like locks?
I know that it may work, but that strikes me as somehow wrong... I'm
used to using things like Lock().acquire() and Lock().release() when
accessing shared data structures,
MRAB wrote:
I suppose it depends on the complexity of the data structure. A dict's
methods are threadsafe, for example, but if you have a data structure
where access leads to multiple method calls then collectively they need
a lock.
It also depends on the nature of the objects being used
as
16 matches
Mail list logo
