.
From: Cooper, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 7:34 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: RE: Obtaining the PyObject * of a class
The part I'm having problem with is as follows:
I want to replace the 'strcmp' below with a call
Are there any Python C API experts/SWIG experts out there that can help
me with this issue please.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cooper, Andrew
Sent: 10 March 2008 15:55
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Obtaining the PyObject *
Cooper, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Are there any Python C API experts/SWIG experts out there that can help
| me with this issue please.
| I',m currently using SWIG to generate a python interface to a C DLL.
Some people have switched to using ctypes for
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cooper, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Are there any Python C API experts/SWIG experts out there that can help
| me with this issue please.
| I',m currently using SWIG to generate
2 things:
1st. there is a python mailing list for people interested in C++ extension
type stuff
2nd. SWIG is useless and overly complicated, its much easier to just
generate your own C++ code by hand, less confusion, and much more clarity.
I find no value in using anything else.
People complain
.
In general, the output one is found in $result, and $input is input
PyObject for that typemap.
From: Michael Wieher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 3:09 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Obtaining the PyObject * of a class
2
Of
Bronner, Gregory
Sent: 11 March 2008 20:52
To: Michael Wieher; python-list@python.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Obtaining the PyObject * of a class
I'd strongly disagree.
SWIG is very useful for wrapping large scale projects in a
non-interfering manner. If you have to generate bindings
