Magnus Lycka wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
>
>>Leif K-Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>Ben Finney wrote:
>
>>So long as you're not distributing some or all of Python itself,
>>or a derivative work, the license for Python has no legal effect
>>on what license you choose fo
Ben Finney wrote:
> Leif K-Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
Ben Finney wrote:
> So long as you're not distributing some or all of Python itself,
> or a derivative work, the license for Python has no legal effect
> on what license you choose for your own work.
>
>> I was reply
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > Write your program in Python, and you can ignore the Python
> > license when you distribute your own work. We'd love to see you
> > distribute it under a free software license, but the license of
> > Python has no legal effect on you
Steve Holden wrote:
> Given that many people distribute (enough of) the interpreter with
> their Python programs I wouldn't like the above to be regarded as a
> blanket statement that the Python license doesn't have to be
> considered when distributing the interpreter with program source.
In prac
Ben Finney wrote:
[...]
> That latter case is the only one for most interpreted Python programs:
> no part of the library is in the source code of the Python program, so
> the license of that library doesn't affect the licensing of the
> program.
>
> Write your program in Python, and you can ignor
Chris Lambacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:46:13PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Ben Finney schrieb:
> > > > My claim (and IANAL) is that it doesn't matter *what* license
> > > > Python is distributed under; unless y
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:46:13PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ben Finney schrieb:
> > > My claim (and IANAL) is that it doesn't matter *what* license
> > > Python is distributed under; unless you do something with Python
> > > that is a right of
"Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Finney schrieb:
> > My claim (and IANAL) is that it doesn't matter *what* license
> > Python is distributed under; unless you do something with Python
> > that is a right of the copyright holder, such as distributing part
> > or all of Python, t
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> Ben Finney schrieb:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > So long as you're not distributing some or all of Python itself,
> > or a derivative work, the license for Python has no legal effect
> > on what license you choose for your own work.
> >
[SNIP]
> > My claim (and
Ben Finney schrieb:
> Leif K-Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
Ben Finney wrote:
> So long as you're not distributing some or all of Python itself,
> or a derivative work, the license for Python has no legal effect
> on what license you choose for your own work.
>
>> I was rep
Leif K-Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Ben Finney wrote:
> >>> So long as you're not distributing some or all of Python itself,
> >>> or a derivative work, the license for Python has no legal effect
> >>> on what license you choose for your own work.
> I was replying to Ben Finney's claim
Steve Holden wrote:
> Leif K-Brooks wrote:
>> Ben Finney wrote:
>>
>>> So long as you're not distributing some or all of Python itself, or a
>>> derivative work, the license for Python has no legal effect on what
>>> license you choose for your own work.
>>
>>
>> How many Python programs use nothin
Leif K-Brooks wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
>
>>So long as you're not distributing some or all of Python itself, or a
>>derivative work, the license for Python has no legal effect on what
>>license you choose for your own work.
>
>
> How many Python programs use nothing from the standard library?
Ben Finney wrote:
> So long as you're not distributing some or all of Python itself, or a
> derivative work, the license for Python has no legal effect on what
> license you choose for your own work.
How many Python programs use nothing from the standard library?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
"GHUM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's one of the great freedoms of Python and its licence: You are
> free to chose the licence for your product. No GPLish "you must be
> as free as we", more BSDish: "Do what you want, do not come crying"
This has nothing to do with the license of Python. Wh
Guy Fawkes schrieb:
> I don't want my program to
> be open-source and so far all the Python programs I've seen included the
> source code.
That's one of the great freedoms of Python and its licence: You are
free to chose the licence for your product. No GPLish "you must be as
free as we", more BS
Guy Fawkes schrieb:
> Is it possible to make an executable?
Hi GF!
http://www.python.net/crew/atuining/cx_Freeze/
Regards,
Gerold
:-)
--
Gerold Penz - bcom - Programmierung
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://gerold.bcom.at |
"Jay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking of the bytecode, how does one create it?
http://effbot.org/zone/python-compile.htm#compiling-python-modules
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Speaking of the bytecode, how does one create it?
Ben Finney wrote:
> "Guy Fawkes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I was wondering if Python programs always need to include the source
> > code with the program itself. I'm asking this because I don't want
> > my program to be open-source and so
"Guy Fawkes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was wondering if Python programs always need to include the source
> code with the program itself. I'm asking this because I don't want
> my program to be open-source and so far all the Python programs I've
> seen included the source code.
You can lice
Guy Fawkes wrote:
> I was wondering if Python programs always need to include the source code
> with the program itself. I'm asking this because I don't want my program to
> be open-source and so far all the Python programs I've seen included the
> source code.
You can include the source code but
21 matches
Mail list logo
