Re: RE: RE: Open running processes

2005-06-30 Thread DeRRudi
> Tim Goldenwrote: > If you wanted to send over arbitrary data from another application, > then this is certainly a way to do it. (Another way might be to use a > Windows pipe, for example). My point was only that if you are signalling > an event as a wake-up call plus an atom of extra information

RE: RE: Open running processes

2005-06-30 Thread Tim Golden
[DeRRudi] | > Tim Goldenwrote: | | > Assuming that you're answering my question: why use mmap and | > not just two events? I understand what your overall plan is, | > and it looks like you have a way to solve it. It just seemed | > that you might be able to achieve the same thing with two | > even

Re: RE: Open running processes

2005-06-30 Thread DeRRudi
> Tim Goldenwrote: > > Rudi. I, at least, am reading this via the mailing list, not > via Usenet nor via Google. This means that if you don't put > any kind of context in what you post, I have to guess at what > you're responding to. (All I see is the exact text you typed, > nothing else). > > A