sibly non-pythonic topic and go read another book or a few hundred so
when it comes up again ...
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Thomas Passin
Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2023 5:04 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Which more Pythonic - self.__class__ or type(self)
Nope. No consensus.
I’d use self.__class__ . Seems more explicit and direct to me.
From: Python-list on
behalf of Ian Pilcher
Date: Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 4:17 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Which more Pythonic - self.__class__ or type(self)?
*** Attention: This is an external
y, March 4, 2023 1:09 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Which more Pythonic - self.__class__ or type(self)?
On 3/4/2023 2:47 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
Even before Python existed there was the adage "a real programmer
can write FORTRAN in any language", indicating that idiomatic
it becomes an
exotic addition to Python in a way that loosely melds, or if it becomes the
PYTHONIC way ...
-Original Message-
From: Alan Gauld
Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2023 1:38 PM
To: avi.e.gr...@gmail.com; python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: RE: Which more Pythonic - self.__class__ or
native language(s).
I am sure some books along these lines have already been written!
Who wants to collaborate?
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of dn via Python-list
Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2023 1:26 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Which more Pythonic - self
and found an
expanding language with way too many ways to do anything and can choose. But
I claim that too is pythonic!
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Thomas Passin
Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2023 1:09 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Which more Pythonic - self.__class
On 2023-03-04 12:38:22 -0500, avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Of course each language has commonly used idioms as C with pointer
> arithmetic and code like *p++=*q++ but my point is that although I live near
> a seaway and from where C originated, I am not aware of words like "c-way"
> or "scenic"
On 04/03/2023 17:38, avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Of course each language has commonly used idioms
>
That's the point, the correct term is probably "idiomatic"
rather than "pythonic" but it is a defacto standard that
idiomatic Python has become known as Pythonic. I don't
think that's a
On 04/03/2023 20.47, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2023-03-03 13:51:11 -0500, avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
...
No. Even before Python existed there was the adage "a real programmer
can write FORTRAN in any language", indicating that idiomatic usage of a
language is not governed by syntax and
On 3/4/2023 2:47 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
Even before Python existed there was the adage "a real programmer
can write FORTRAN in any language", indicating that idiomatic usage of a
language is not governed by syntax and library alone, but there is a
cultural element: People writing code in a
python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Which more Pythonic - self.__class__ or type(self)?
On 2023-03-03 13:51:11 -0500, avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
> I do not buy into any concept about something being pythonic or not.
>
> Python has grown too vast and innovated quite a bit, but als
On 2023-03-03 13:51:11 -0500, avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
> I do not buy into any concept about something being pythonic or not.
>
> Python has grown too vast and innovated quite a bit, but also borrowed from
> others and vice versa.
>
> There generally is no universally pythonic way nor
On 4/03/23 7:51 am, avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
I leave you with the question of the day. Was Voldemort pythonic?
Well, he was fluent in Parseltongue, which is not a good sign.
I hope not, otherwise we'll have to rename Python to "The Language
That Shall Not Be Named" and watch out for
you should not care
about efficiency! LOL!
I leave you with the question of the day. Was Voldemort pythonic?
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Alan Gauld
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 4:43 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Which more Pythonic - self.__class__
On 3/3/23 03:32, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 at 20:44, Alan Gauld wrote:
>> On 02/03/2023 20:54, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>>> Seems like an FAQ, and I've found a few things on StackOverflow that
>>> discuss the technical differences in edge cases, but I haven't found
>>> anything that
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 at 20:44, Alan Gauld wrote:
>
> On 02/03/2023 20:54, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> > Seems like an FAQ, and I've found a few things on StackOverflow that
> > discuss the technical differences in edge cases, but I haven't found
> > anything that talks about which form is considered to be
On 02/03/2023 20:54, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> Seems like an FAQ, and I've found a few things on StackOverflow that
> discuss the technical differences in edge cases, but I haven't found
> anything that talks about which form is considered to be more Pythonic
> in those situations where there's no
Subject: Re: Which more Pythonic - self.__class__ or type(self)?
On 3/2/2023 5:53 PM, Greg Ewing via Python-list wrote:
> On 3/03/23 9:54 am, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>> I haven't found
>> anything that talks about which form is considered to be more Pythonic
>> in those situations where
On 3/2/2023 5:53 PM, Greg Ewing via Python-list wrote:
On 3/03/23 9:54 am, Ian Pilcher wrote:
I haven't found
anything that talks about which form is considered to be more Pythonic
in those situations where there's no functional difference.
In such cases I'd probably go for type(x), because
On 3/03/23 9:54 am, Ian Pilcher wrote:
I haven't found
anything that talks about which form is considered to be more Pythonic
in those situations where there's no functional difference.
In such cases I'd probably go for type(x), because it looks less
ugly.
x.__class__ *might* be slightly more
On 3/2/2023 3:54 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
Seems like an FAQ, and I've found a few things on StackOverflow that
discuss the technical differences in edge cases, but I haven't found
anything that talks about which form is considered to be more Pythonic
in those situations where there's no functional
21 matches
Mail list logo
