Amir Michail a écrit :
Hi,
It seems to me that measuring productivity in a programming language
must take into account available tools and libraries.
Eclipse for example provides such an amazing IDE for java that it is no
longer obvious to me that one would be much more productive in
Amir Michail wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me that measuring productivity in a programming language
must take into account available tools and libraries.
Eclipse for example provides such an amazing IDE for java that it is no
longer obvious to me that one would be much more productive in
Hi,
Here's a blog post that is relevant to this discussion:
http://sixthandredriver.typepad.com/river_of_code/2006/01/automated_refac.html
Amir
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of krishnakant Mane
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 6:19 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: python vs java eclipse
just used the py dev plugin for eclipse.
it is great.
auto indentation and intellisence.
and all other things.
so now how does it look from this end
On 1 Dec 2006 01:24:47 -0800, Amir Michail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eclipse for example provides such an amazing IDE for java that it is no
longer obvious to me that one would be much more productive in python
for medium sized projects.
Eclipse can generate a lot of the Java boilerplate code,
just used the py dev plugin for eclipse.
it is great.
auto indentation and intellisence.
and all other things.
so now how does it look from this end?
python + productivity and eclipse + productivity = double productivity!
only problem with the plugin is that I find it difficult to manage the
krishnakant Mane wrote:
just used the py dev plugin for eclipse.
it is great.
auto indentation and intellisence.
and all other things.
so now how does it look from this end?
python + productivity and eclipse + productivity = double productivity!
only problem with the plugin is that I find
Thomas Ploch schrieb:
Amir Michail schrieb:
Hi,
It seems to me that measuring productivity in a programming language
must take into account available tools and libraries.
Eclipse for example provides such an amazing IDE for java that it is no
longer obvious to me that one would be much
Thomas Ploch wrote:
Thomas Ploch schrieb:
Amir Michail schrieb:
Hi,
It seems to me that measuring productivity in a programming language
must take into account available tools and libraries.
Eclipse for example provides such an amazing IDE for java that it is no
longer obvious to me that
krishnakant Mane wrote:
just used the py dev plugin for eclipse.
it is great.
But isn't support for java better because the eclipse ide can take
advantage of explicit type declarations (e.g., for intellisense,
refactoring, etc.)?
Amir
auto indentation and intellisence.
and all other
Amir Michail escreveu:
krishnakant Mane wrote:
just used the py dev plugin for eclipse.
it is great.
But isn't support for java better because the eclipse ide can take
advantage of explicit type declarations (e.g., for intellisense,
refactoring, etc.)?
Amir
The support for Java is
Stephen Eilert wrote:
The support for Java is light-years ahead. Sometimes I feel that
Eclipse is coding for me (quickfix, for instance).
Eclipse may be quite a technical achievement, but I found it
irritating. Aside from the misuse of screen real-estate, I found that
typing two characters and
Paul Boddie wrote:
Eclipse may be quite a technical achievement, but I found it
irritating. Aside from the misuse of screen real-estate, I found
that typing two characters and having what seemed like half my
source file underlined in red, with multiple messages telling me
that I had yet to
hg wrote:
Thomas Ploch wrote:
Yes, thats true, but since eclipse is resource monster (it is still
using java), and some people (like me) don't have a super fresh and new
computer
If you compare eclipse to VS, it is not that memory hungry
And if you compare Saturn to Jupiter, it's not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Is there anything _useful_ that it'll bring that a good editor doesn't?
e.g. in vim I do get
* automatic syntax checking (if I type if a=1: and hit enter, it'll
immediately highlight the syntax error)
* omni-completion (because Intellisense is trademarked)
*
Amir Michail wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Is there anything _useful_ that it'll bring that a good editor doesn't?
e.g. in vim I do get
* automatic syntax checking (if I type if a=1: and hit enter, it'll
immediately highlight the syntax error)
* omni-completion (because
16 matches
Mail list logo
