Re: [*SPAM*] Python open proxy honeypot

2006-06-14 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Alex Reinhart wrote: > Eric S. Johansson wrote: >> Alex Reinhart wrote: >>> Yeah, I just realized that. What would I do to act as an open proxy as >>> well? >> emulate the Apache proxy capability, especially the reverse proxy. >> >> more seriously, what you need to do is from common proxy and web s

Re: [*SPAM*] Python open proxy honeypot

2006-06-13 Thread Alex Reinhart
Eric S. Johansson wrote: > Alex Reinhart wrote: >> Yeah, I just realized that. What would I do to act as an open proxy as >> well? > > emulate the Apache proxy capability, especially the reverse proxy. > > more seriously, what you need to do is from common proxy and web server > ports, accept pro

Re: [*SPAM*] Python open proxy honeypot

2006-06-13 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Alex Reinhart wrote: > Yeah, I just realized that. What would I do to act as an open proxy as well? emulate the Apache proxy capability, especially the reverse proxy. more seriously, what you need to do is from common proxy and web server ports, accept proxy requests with a destination port numb

Re: [*SPAM*] Python open proxy honeypot

2006-06-13 Thread Alex Reinhart
Tim Williams wrote: > On 13/06/06, Alex Reinhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Is running Python's built-in smtpd, pretending to accept and forward all >> messages, enough to get me noticed by a spammer, or do I have to do >> something else to "advertise" my script as an open proxy? > > This wi

Re: [*SPAM*] Python open proxy honeypot

2006-06-13 Thread Tim Williams
On 13/06/06, Alex Reinhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is running Python's built-in smtpd, pretending to accept and forward all > messages, enough to get me noticed by a spammer, or do I have to do > something else to "advertise" my script as an open proxy? This will get you noticed by crawlers