On 29/04/2015 05:05, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Monday, April 27, 2015 at 12:52:48 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 27.04.15 um 01:06 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Ben Finney
wrote:
It doesn't have to.
On Monday, April 27, 2015 at 12:52:48 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> > Am 27.04.15 um 01:06 schrieb Chris Angelico:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Ben Finney
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It doesn't have to. By using the n
On 2015-04-26, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I want to use a GUI for Python. When searching I found (beside some
> others) Tkinter and wxPython. From what I found it looks like Tkinter
> is slightly better. What would be the pros/cons of these two? Would
> there be a compelling reason to use another GU
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 April 2015 16:59, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Steven D'Aprano
>> wrote:
>>> I don't think that choosing UCS-2 only is any worse than any other
>>> application feature like "support only jpegs,
Am 28.04.15 um 09:54 schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
On Tuesday 28 April 2015 16:59, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
I don't think that choosing UCS-2 only is any worse than any other
application feature like "support only jpegs, not every obscure image
On Tuesday 28 April 2015 16:59, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> I don't think that choosing UCS-2 only is any worse than any other
>> application feature like "support only jpegs, not every obscure image
>> format GIMP supports" or "choose to u
Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
>Yes, the default theme is terrible on Linux (Mac & Windows uses native
>widgets). There are additional themes available, which are buried in
>some packages and a bit difficult to install, but give reasonable
>approximations to the QT look; I'm talking about plastik
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> I don't think that choosing UCS-2 only is any worse than any other
> application feature like "support only jpegs, not every obscure image format
> GIMP supports" or "choose to use floating point maths instead of some
> numeric type with un
On Tuesday 28 April 2015 15:32, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> On Monday 27 April 2015 17:22, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>>> This is a problem that won't just "go away". As more SMP blocks get
>>> assigned, more people will start using them, and
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2015 17:22, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> This is a problem that won't just "go away". As more SMP blocks get
>> assigned, more people will start using them, and get frustrated at
>> your program for not letting them. (And w
On Monday 27 April 2015 17:22, Chris Angelico wrote:
> This is a problem that won't just "go away". As more SMP blocks get
> assigned, more people will start using them, and get frustrated at
> your program for not letting them. (And why should an end user need to
> know the difference between 😃 a
Am 27.04.15 um 19:02 schrieb Grant Edwards:
On 2015-04-26, Ben Finney wrote:
Steven D'Aprano writes:
Tkinter is easier to use, as it is standard with Python. So long as
you have Tk/Tcl installed on your computer, Tkinter should work fine.
However, Tkinter probably looks a bit more old fashi
On 2015-04-26, Ben Finney wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>
>> Tkinter is easier to use, as it is standard with Python. So long as
>> you have Tk/Tcl installed on your computer, Tkinter should work fine.
>>
>> However, Tkinter probably looks a bit more old fashioned.
>
> It doesn't have to. By u
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:54 am, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 27.04.15 um 09:15 schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
>> On Monday 27 April 2015 16:55, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
>>
>>> YMMV. Is non-BMP needed for any living non-esoteric language? I agree
>>> that it is a big flaw, but still is useful for ve
Am 27.04.15 um 09:15 schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
On Monday 27 April 2015 16:55, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
YMMV. Is non-BMP needed for any living non-esoteric language? I agree
that it is a big flaw, but still is useful for very many projects.
Yes.
The Unicode Supplementary Multilingual Planes
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 27.04.15 um 01:06 schrieb Chris Angelico:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Ben Finney
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It doesn't have to. By using the newer ‘tkinter.ttk’ library
>>> https://docs.python.org/3/library/tkinter.ttk.html>, the
On Monday 27 April 2015 16:55, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> YMMV. Is non-BMP needed for any living non-esoteric language? I agree
> that it is a big flaw, but still is useful for very many projects.
Yes.
The Unicode Supplementary Multilingual Planes (SMPs) are used for rare but
still current E
Am 27.04.15 um 01:06 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
It doesn't have to. By using the newer ‘tkinter.ttk’ library
https://docs.python.org/3/library/tkinter.ttk.html>, the GUI will
use native look-and-feel widgets.
Does the new library also deal with
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>
>> Tkinter is easier to use, as it is standard with Python. So long as
>> you have Tk/Tcl installed on your computer, Tkinter should work fine.
>>
>> However, Tkinter probably looks a bit more old fashioned.
>
> It doe
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> Tkinter is easier to use, as it is standard with Python. So long as
> you have Tk/Tcl installed on your computer, Tkinter should work fine.
>
> However, Tkinter probably looks a bit more old fashioned.
It doesn't have to. By using the newer ‘tkinter.ttk’ library
https:/
On 04/26/2015 11:07 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 19:12 CEST schreef Gary Herron:
On 04/26/2015 09:32 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 17:09 CEST schreef Steven D'Aprano:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:02 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I want to use a GUI for Python.
>
> But just curious: what is the reason you use five different kinds of
> GUI? It seems like it makes think difficult for you. I mean the
> question as enlightenment for myself.
A good question :). Most of this comes from the openness to create binding for
many projects. Tkinter is a binding o
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 19:12 CEST schreef Gary Herron:
> On 04/26/2015 09:32 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 17:09 CEST schreef Steven D'Aprano:
>>
>>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:02 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>>
I want to use a GUI for Python. When searching I found (beside
>>
On 04/26/2015 09:32 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 17:09 CEST schreef Steven D'Aprano:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:02 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I want to use a GUI for Python. When searching I found (beside some
others) Tkinter and wxPython. From what I found it looks like
Tkint
On 26/04/2015 17:16, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 15:02 CEST schreef Cecil Westerhof:
I want to use a GUI for Python. When searching I found (beside some
others) Tkinter and wxPython. From what I found it looks like
Tkinter is slightly better. What would be the pros/cons of thes
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 17:09 CEST schreef Steven D'Aprano:
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:02 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
>> I want to use a GUI for Python. When searching I found (beside some
>> others) Tkinter and wxPython. From what I found it looks like
>> Tkinter is slightly better. What would be th
Op Sunday 26 Apr 2015 15:02 CEST schreef Cecil Westerhof:
> I want to use a GUI for Python. When searching I found (beside some
> others) Tkinter and wxPython. From what I found it looks like
> Tkinter is slightly better. What would be the pros/cons of these
> two? Would there be a compelling reas
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:02 pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I want to use a GUI for Python. When searching I found (beside some
> others) Tkinter and wxPython. From what I found it looks like Tkinter
> is slightly better. What would be the pros/cons of these two? Would
> there be a compelling reason to
28 matches
Mail list logo
