On 01/11/17 18:57, Stefan Ram wrote:
Ned Batchelder writes:
You should not optimize for the shortest time to paste a line of code.Â
You should take time and care writing your code, so that it reads best
and runs best. If you needed another os function, would you have two
__import__("os") in y
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 08:02 am, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
>
>> Wolfgang Maier writes:
>>>If you're worried bout having things on separate lines, you could write:
>>>import os; os.getcwd()
>>>,etc., which is actually saving a few characters :)
>>
>> Yes, b
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 05:57 am, Stefan Ram wrote:
> I also have heard that there was a module cache, so I
> was hoping that a second import of the same module might
> not be such an effort for the implementation.
There is: sys.modules.
Although `import spam` is cheap when spam is in the cache, its
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 04:25 am, Stefan Ram wrote:
> I started to collect some code snippets:
[...]
> __import__( "random" ).random()
>
> And so on. You get the idea.
>
> However, reportedly, all those snippets are anti-patterns
> because they use »__import__«.
Correct. Nearly all dunder fun
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
>
>> Wolfgang Maier writes:
>>>If you're worried bout having things on separate lines, you could write:
>>>import os; os.getcwd()
>>>,etc., which is actually saving a few characters :)
>>
>> Yes,
r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
> Wolfgang Maier writes:
>>If you're worried bout having things on separate lines, you could write:
>>import os; os.getcwd()
>>,etc., which is actually saving a few characters :)
>
> Yes, but there still is the risk of the identifier »os«
> already
On 11/01/2017 06:25 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> import random
> ...
> random.random()
>
> Now, the user has to cut the import, paste it to the top
> of his code, then go back to the list of snippets, find
> the same snippet again, copy the expression, go to his code,
> then find the point whe
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Wolfgang Maier writes:
>>If you're worried bout having things on separate lines, you could write:
>>import os; os.getcwd()
>>,etc., which is actually saving a few characters :)
>
> Yes, but there still is the risk of the identifier »os«
> al
On 01.11.2017 18:25, Stefan Ram wrote:
I started to collect some code snippets:
Sleep one second
__import__( "time" ).sleep( 1 )
Get current directory
__import__( "os" ).getcwd()
Get a random number
__import__( "random" ).random()
And so on. You get the idea.
However, re
On 11/1/17 1:25 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
I started to collect some code snippets:
Sleep one second
__import__( "time" ).sleep( 1 )
Get current directory
__import__( "os" ).getcwd()
Get a random number
__import__( "random" ).random()
And so on. You get the idea.
However, rep
On 2017-11-01, Stefan Ram wrote:
> I started to collect some code snippets:
>
> Sleep one second
>
> __import__( "time" ).sleep( 1 )
>
> What I'm supposed to do instead, I guess, is:
>
> Sleep one second
>
> import time
> ...
> time.sleep( 1 )
>
> Get current directory
>
> import os
> ..
11 matches
Mail list logo
