On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Patrick Stinson wrote:
> Thanks for the stories in this and the other thread. I love these interesting
> problems that push the limits :)
I agree. How boring is life when we never push the limits!
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> On Nov 23, 2014, at 4:57 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Patrick Stinson
> wrote:
>> I think this is the way I’ll take it, and for all the same reasons. The only
>> way they can break it is if they really want to. I guess anything other
>> Franken-apps would
I think this is the way I’ll take it, and for all the same reasons. The only
way they can break it is if they really want to. I guess anything other
Franken-apps would be interesting to hear about too. And I’ll still stick it on
the app store.
> On Nov 23, 2014, at 1:35 AM, Chris Angelico wro
Thanks for your great reply. I even augmented the reloading with the same dict
by clearing all of the non-standard symbols from the dict. This effectively
resets the dict:
# try to clear out the module by deleting all global refs
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Patrick Stinson wrote:
> I think this is the way I’ll take it, and for all the same reasons. The only
> way they can break it is if they really want to. I guess anything other
> Franken-apps would be interesting to hear about too. And I’ll still stick it
> on t
Chris Angelico schrieb am 23.11.2014 um 11:35:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Patrick Stinson wrote:
>> Is there a better and more secure way to do the python-within-python in
>> order allow users to automate your app?
>
> More secure? Basically no. You could push the inner script into a
> sep
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Patrick Stinson wrote:
> Thanks for your great reply. I even augmented the reloading with the same
> dict by clearing all of the non-standard symbols from the dict. This
> effectively resets the dict:
You may as well start with an empty dict and then pick up the f
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Patrick Stinson wrote:
> I am writing a python app (using PyQt, but that’s not important here), and
> want my users to be able to write their own scripts to automate the app’s
> functioning using an engine API hat I expose. I have extensive experience
> doing th
