Thank you, everyone, for your suggestions. I'll try them all and
decide which I like best.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:15:57 +0200, Hans Mulder said:
> On 17/06/11 19:47:50, Timo Lindemann wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:57:25 +, Jason Friedman said:
>>
>>
>>
>>> but for various reasons I want a single script. Any alternatives?
>>
>> you can use a here document like this:
> That does n
On 17/06/11 19:47:50, Timo Lindemann wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:57:25 +, Jason Friedman said:
but for various reasons I want a single script. Any alternatives?
you can use a here document like this:
#! /bin/bash
/usr/bin/python2<< EOPYTHON
def hello():
print("Hello, Worl
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:57:25 +, Jason Friedman said:
>
> but for various reasons I want a single script. Any alternatives?
you can use a here document like this:
#! /bin/bash
/usr/bin/python2 << EOPYTHON
def hello():
print("Hello, World");
if __name__ == "__main__":
hel
rusi wrote:
> On Jun 17, 6:05 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> > Python call becomes. I'd prefer something like:
>>
>> #!/bin/bash
>> for i in 1 2 3 4; do
>> python -c "if True:
> # comfortably indented python code
>
> Thanks. Nice!
You can use bash here document feature, <<-, that strips hea
On Jun 17, 6:05 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > Python call becomes. I'd prefer something like:
>
> #!/bin/bash
> for i in 1 2 3 4; do
> python -c "if True:
# comfortably indented python code
Thanks. Nice!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Jason Friedman wrote:
> The code behaves as I expect and want, but the de-denting of the
> Python call is unattractive, especially unattractive the longer the
> Python call becomes. I'd prefer something like:
>
#!/bin/bash
for i in 1 2 3 4; do
python -c "if Tr
