Dun Peal, 28.10.2010 09:10:
I find myself surprised at the relatively little use that Cython is seeing.
I don't think it's being used that little. It just doesn't show that
easily. We get a lot of feedback on the mailing list that suggests that
it's actually used by all sorts of people in
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Well, the estimate is about one man-month, so it would be doable in about
three months time if we had the money to work on it. So far, no one has made
a serious offer to support that project, though.
I find myself
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Or, a bit shorter, using Cython 0.13:
def only_allowed_characters(list strings):
cdef unicode s
return any((c 31 or c 127)
for s in strings for c in s)
Very cool, this caused me to
Dun Peal, 20.10.2010 02:07:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Or, a bit shorter, using Cython 0.13:
def only_allowed_characters(list strings):
cdef unicode s
return any((c 31 or c 127)
for s in strings for c in s)
Very cool, this
Dun Peal, 17.10.2010 21:59:
`all_ascii(L)` is a function that accepts a list of strings L, and
returns True if all of those strings contain only ASCII chars, False
otherwise.
What's the fastest way to implement `all_ascii(L)`?
My ideas so far are:
1. Match against a regexp with a character
On 2010-10-18, Steven D'Aprano steve-remove-t...@cybersource.com.au wrote:
Neither is accurate. all_ascii would be:
all(ord(c) = 127 for c in string for string in L)
Definitely.
all_printable would be considerably harder. As far as I can tell, there's
no simple way to tell if a character
On 10/18/10 09:28, Grant Edwards wrote:
There's no easy way to even define what printable means. Ask three
different people, and you'll get at least four different answers
answers.
I don't have a printer...that makes *all* characters unprintable,
right? Now I can convert the algorithm to
Printable in the screen, all of them are, except for blank spaces ehhehehe
2010/10/18, Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com:
On 10/18/10 09:28, Grant Edwards wrote:
There's no easy way to even define what printable means. Ask three
different people, and you'll get at least four different
On 2010-10-17, Dun Peal dunpea...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the fastest way to implement `all_ascii(L)`?
Start by defining it.
1. Match against a regexp with a character range: `[ -~]`
What about tabs and newlines? For that matter, what about DEL and
BEL? Seems to me that the entire 0-127
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:59:22 +0100, Dun Peal dunpea...@gmail.com wrote:
`all_ascii(L)` is a function that accepts a list of strings L, and
returns True if all of those strings contain only ASCII chars, False
otherwise.
What's the fastest way to implement `all_ascii(L)`?
My ideas so far are:
On Oct 17, 12:59 pm, Dun Peal dunpea...@gmail.com wrote:
`all_ascii(L)` is a function that accepts a list of strings L, and
returns True if all of those strings contain only ASCII chars, False
otherwise.
What's the fastest way to implement `all_ascii(L)`?
My ideas so far are:
1. Match
On 10/17/10 19:04, Rhodri James wrote:
import string
return set(.join(L))= set(string.printable)
I've no idea whether this is faster or slower than any of your
suggestions.
For set(.join(L)) to return, it has to scan the entire input
list/string. Imagine
s = UNPRINTABLE_CHAR +
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 01:04:09 +0100, Rhodri James wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:59:22 +0100, Dun Peal dunpea...@gmail.com
wrote:
`all_ascii(L)` is a function that accepts a list of strings L, and
returns True if all of those strings contain only ASCII chars, False
otherwise.
What's the
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 14:59 -0500, Dun Peal wrote:
`all_ascii(L)` is a function that accepts a list of strings L, and
returns True if all of those strings contain only ASCII chars, False
otherwise.
What's the fastest way to implement `all_ascii(L)`?
My ideas so far are:
1. Match
14 matches
Mail list logo
