On Apr 28, 3:59 pm, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
The trick works only for objects that are tracked by CPython's garbage
collector. Simple and non-containerish objects like str, int, unicode
and some other types aren't tracked by the gc.
Yes they are -- have you ever tried
On Apr 27, 11:45 pm, Michal M mich.mier...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've just found out that one of objects is not destroyed when it
should be. This means that something was holding reference to this
object or part of it (i.e. method). Is there any way to check what
holds that reference? I am
On Apr 28, 12:02 am, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Michal M mich.mier...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 27 Kwi, 23:21, Duncan Booth duncan.bo...@invalid.invalid wrote:
Michal M
On 27 April 2010 23:08, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Michal M mich.mier...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I've just found out that one of objects is not destroyed when it
should be. This means that something was holding reference to this
object or part of
Almar Klein wrote:
Ah, it does exist! I wish I knew that two months ago, it would've saved me
some precious time ;)
The trick works only for objects that are tracked by CPython's garbage
collector. Simple and non-containerish objects like str, int, unicode
and some other types aren't tracked
Michal,
May I ask why do you care about the object's management? Let Python worry
about that. What's your use case?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I've just found out that one of objects is not destroyed when it
should be. This means that something was holding reference to this
object or part of it (i.e. method). Is there any way to check what
holds that reference? I am unable to do that just looking to the code
or debugging it because
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Michal M mich.mier...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've just found out that one of objects is not destroyed when it
should be. This means that something was holding reference to this
object or part of it (i.e. method). Is there any way to check what
holds that
Michal M mich.mier...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi
I've just found out that one of objects is not destroyed when it
should be. This means that something was holding reference to this
object or part of it (i.e. method). Is there any way to check what
holds that reference? I am unable to do that
On 27 Kwi, 23:21, Duncan Booth duncan.bo...@invalid.invalid wrote:
Michal M mich.mier...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi
I've just found out that one of objects is not destroyed when it
should be. This means that something was holding reference to this
object or part of it (i.e. method). Is
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Michal M mich.mier...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 27 Kwi, 23:21, Duncan Booth duncan.bo...@invalid.invalid wrote:
Michal M mich.mier...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've just found out that one of objects is not destroyed when it
should be. This means that something
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Michal M mich.mier...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 27 Kwi, 23:21, Duncan Booth duncan.bo...@invalid.invalid wrote:
Michal M mich.mier...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've just found out that one of
12 matches
Mail list logo
