Re: Identifying messages in a thread (was: Please keep the full address)

2008-03-06 Thread castironpi
On Mar 6, 10:47 am, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:58:06 -0800 (PST) > > Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't want to have to tag every thread.  I just want to *plonk* > > > certain posters. > > > > Anyway, I'll live with Google's failings I gue

Re: Identifying messages in a thread (was: Please keep the full address)

2008-03-06 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:58:06 -0800 (PST) Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't want to have to tag every thread. I just want to *plonk* > > certain posters. > > > > Anyway, I'll live with Google's failings I guess. > > Sounds like you need better filtering. > > A decent news filter sh

Re: Identifying messages in a thread (was: Please keep the full address)

2008-03-06 Thread Carl Banks
On Mar 5, 8:11 pm, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:36:29 +1100 > > Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Those of us who identify the time wasters would also like to drop > > > the responses to their posts and changing the address makes this > > > imposs

Re: Identifying messages in a thread (was: Please keep the full address)

2008-03-05 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:36:29 +1100 Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Those of us who identify the time wasters would also like to drop > > the responses to their posts and changing the address makes this > > impossible. > > Not at all. AFAIK the messages from Google mail correctly include