Leandro Lameiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe I've got a distorted impression about the importance of this. As
> I'm not an experienced programmer, I'd probably trust more in your
> impressions than mine. :)
Good call. :)
> I mean, if we all agreed that it is a common thing, a patch for thi
Hi Fredrik (and other too). First of all, thanks for taking your time
to help me.
On 10/15/05, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leandro Lameiro wrote:
>
> > What's wrong in having a function like the one I said, that would
> > split files for you, feed md5.update and, when it is over, re
"Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Forcing every digest module to add code to cater for just one of many
> > use cases is most likely a waste of time.
> here's the hash API specification, btw:
> http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0247.html
I agree with you and Mike that a file checksu
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Forcing every digest module to add code to cater for just one of many
> use cases is most likely a waste of time.
here's the hash API specification, btw:
http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0247.html
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Leandro Lameiro wrote:
> What's wrong in having a function like the one I said, that would
> split files for you, feed md5.update and, when it is over, return the
> digest?
Calculating the digest sum for a file on disk, without doing anything else
with that file, is a very small subset of everyth
Leandro Lameiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What's wrong in having a function like the one I said, that would
> split files for you, feed md5.update and, when it is over, return the
> digest?
Nothing in particular; it's just a trivial thing to write. If you add
every usefull utility function to
