Facundo Batista wrote:
> Steve Holden wrote:
>
>
>>1) There is work afoot to build timeout arguments into network libraries
>>for 2.6, and I know Facundo Batista has been involved, you might want to
>>Google or email Facundo about that.
>
>
> Right now (in svn trunk) httplib, ftplib, telnetli
Steve Holden wrote:
> 1) There is work afoot to build timeout arguments into network libraries
> for 2.6, and I know Facundo Batista has been involved, you might want to
> Google or email Facundo about that.
Right now (in svn trunk) httplib, ftplib, telnetlib, etc, has a timeout
argument.
If y
John Nagle wrote:
> I took a look at Facundo Batista's work in the tracker, and he
> currently seems to be trying to work out a good way to test the
> existing SSL module. It has to connect to something to be tested,
Right now, test_socket_ssl.py has, besides the previous tests, the
capabil
Steve Holden wrote:
> John Nagle wrote:
>> Then we'd have a reasonable network timeout system.
>> We have about half of the above now, but it's not consistent.
>>
>> Comments?
>>
> The only comments I'll make for now are
>
> 1) There is work afoot to build timeout arguments into network libraries
John Nagle wrote:
>I thought I had all the timeout problems with urllib worked around,
> but no.
>
>socket.setdefaulttimeout is useful, but not always effective.
> I'm setting that to 15 seconds.
> If the host end won't open the connection within 15 seconds,
> urllib times out. But if the
