On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 at 20:27, Weatherby,Gerard wrote:
>
> I’m not aware of any standard convention for laying out packages.
>
> PEP 8 (https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/) specifies conventions for how to
> write Python, so a standard layout PEP would not be inconsistent.
>
PEP 8 species rules for
I’m not aware of any standard convention for laying out packages.
PEP 8 (https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/) specifies conventions for how to
write Python, so a standard layout PEP would not be inconsistent.
—
Gerard Weatherby | Application Architect NMRbox | NAN | Department of Molecular
Biolog
> On 30 Jul 2022, at 13:52, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
>
> Isn't there a PEP?
PEP are for improving python. They are not for telling people how to use python.
I would be surprised to fine a PEP that addressed this.
Barry
>
>> On 2022-07-26 07:14 c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am
Isn't there a PEP?
On 2022-07-26 07:14 c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure if I looked into the correct sources. I was looking in
> "PEP 609 – Python Packaging Authority (PyPA) Governance" [1] and the
> "PyPA specifications" [2].
>
> My question in short: Is there an official d
