Isaac Gouy wrote:
[...]
> I think it would be silly to dispute whether or not programs that have
> import psyco; psyco.bind are Python programs.
>
> I'm not sure it would be equally silly to dispute whether or not
> programs with type declarations have moved away from being Python
> programs.
i do
On Mar 2, 12:02 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Isaac Gouy wrote:
> > On Mar 1, 11:24 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> >> Isaac Gouy wrote:
> >>> On Mar 1, 8:10 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> As long as that gives you improvements of
> 100-1000 times almost for free, I wouldn't bother too much with cha
Paul Boddie wrote:
On 1 Mar, 15:20, Steve Holden wrote:
Kless wrote:
Does anybody has seen the performance of Python 3?
Respect to speed it's the last language together to Ruby 1.8, but Ruby
1.9 has a lot of better performance. :(
I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with P
On 1 Mar, 15:20, Steve Holden wrote:
> Kless wrote:
> > Does anybody has seen the performance of Python 3?
> > Respect to speed it's the last language together to Ruby 1.8, but Ruby
> > 1.9 has a lot of better performance. :(
>
> I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
2009/3/1 Paul Rubin :
> Steve Holden writes:
>> I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
>
> In the real world, people care about the relative speed of programs.
Yes, and they care about the cost of programs, and about the
functionality of programs. If I wanted fast co
Isaac Gouy wrote:
> On Mar 1, 11:24 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Isaac Gouy wrote:
>>> On Mar 1, 8:10 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
As long as that gives you improvements of
100-1000 times almost for free, I wouldn't bother too much with changing
the platform just because someone shows me
On Mar 1, 11:24 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Isaac Gouy wrote:
> > On Mar 1, 8:10 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> >> As long as that gives you improvements of
> >> 100-1000 times almost for free, I wouldn't bother too much with changing
> >> the platform just because someone shows me benchmark results of
On Mar 1, 11:15 am, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * Isaac Gouy (Sun, 1 Mar 2009 08:27:05 -0800 (PST))
>
> > On Mar 1, 8:10 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > > Paul Rubin wrote:
> > > > Steve Holden writes:
> > > >> I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
>
> > > > In the real w
Isaac Gouy wrote:
> On Mar 1, 8:10 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> As long as that gives you improvements of
>> 100-1000 times almost for free, I wouldn't bother too much with changing
>> the platform just because someone shows me benchmark results of some code
>> that I absolutely don't need in my dai
* Isaac Gouy (Sun, 1 Mar 2009 08:27:05 -0800 (PST))
> On Mar 1, 8:10 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > Paul Rubin wrote:
> > > Steve Holden writes:
> > >> I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
> >
> > > In the real world, people care about the relative speed of programs.
On Mar 1, 8:10 am, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Paul Rubin wrote:
> > Steve Holden writes:
> >> I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
>
> > In the real world, people care about the relative speed of programs.
>
> Fine, but theShootoutonAliothisn't a particularly pythonic
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Steve Holden writes:
>> I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
>
> In the real world, people care about the relative speed of programs.
Fine, but the Shootout on Alioth isn't a particularly pythonic one. It
deals almost exclusively with computati
Steve Holden writes:
> I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
In the real world, people care about the relative speed of programs.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Kless wrote:
> Does anybody has seen the performance of Python 3?
> Respect to speed it's the last language together to Ruby 1.8, but Ruby
> 1.9 has a lot of better performance. :(
>
I'm not sure what you think the speed of Ruby has to do with Python.
Unless, of course, you are simply trying to fo
Kless schrieb:
> Does anybody has seen the performance of Python 3?
> Respect to speed it's the last language together to Ruby 1.8, but Ruby
> 1.9 has a lot of better performance. :(
Python 3.0 is slower than Python 2.5 and 2.6. Lot's of code was added or
modified -- code that hasn't been optimize
Is this what you are looking for?
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32q/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=python3&lang2=yarv&box=1
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Kless wrote:
> Does anybody has seen the performance of Python 3?
> Respect to speed it's the last language together to Ruby 1.8, but Rub
16 matches
Mail list logo
