Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jan 10, 2005, at 8:00 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
There isn't, IMHO, anything with the polish of (say) Microsoft Access,
or even Microsoft SQL Server's less brilliant interfaces. Some things
Microsoft *can* do well, it's a shame they didn't just stick to the
knitting.
Though
> "Steve" == Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>> Usually you wouldn't run a public corba or pyro service over
>> >>> the internet. You'd use something like XMLRPC over HTTP port
>> >>> 80 partly for the precise purpose of not getting blocked by
>> >>> firewalls.
Thus spake Steve Holden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I teach the odd security class, and what you say is far
> from true. As long as the service is located behind a
> firewall which opens up the correct holes for it, it's
> most unlikely that corporate firewalls would disallow
> client connections to su
On Jan 10, 2005, at 8:00 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
Ah yes, but is there really? For example, I did a search of the TOC
of GTK+ Reference Manual:
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/index.html
for the word "data", and there's apparently no widget which is
explicitly tied to databases. So in G
Mark Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>Also, is there a good tool for writing database UIs?
> > Yes, quite a few.
>
> Ah yes, but is there really? For example, I did a search of the TOC of
> GTK+ Reference Manual:
Try looking on freshmeat or sourceforge instead.
--
http://mail.python.org/ma
Ville Vainio wrote:
"Mark" == Mark Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> Mark Carter wrote:
>> Paul Rubin wrote:
>>> Usually you wouldn't run a public corba or pyro service over
>>> the internet. You'd use something like XMLRPC over HTTP port
>>> 80 partly for the precise p
Mark Carter wrote:
Paul Rubin wrote:
Mark Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Supposing I decide to write a server-side application using something
like corba or pyro.
Usually you wouldn't run a public corba or pyro service over the
internet. You'd use something like XMLRPC over HTTP port 80 partl
> "Mark" == Mark Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> Mark Carter wrote:
>> Paul Rubin wrote:
>>> Usually you wouldn't run a public corba or pyro service over
>>> the internet. You'd use something like XMLRPC over HTTP port
>>> 80 partly for the precise purpose of not
On 2005-01-10, Diez B. Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Usually you wouldn't run a public corba or pyro service over
>> the internet. You'd use something like XMLRPC over HTTP port
>> 80 partly for the precise purpose of not getting blocked by
>> firewalls.
>
> What exactly makes sending by
Mark Carter wrote:
Paul Rubin wrote:
Usually you wouldn't run a public corba or pyro service over the
internet. You'd use something like XMLRPC over HTTP port 80 partly
for the precise purpose of not getting blocked by firewalls.
I'm not sure if we're talking at cross-purposes here, but the
appl
> Usually you wouldn't run a public corba or pyro service over the
> internet. You'd use something like XMLRPC over HTTP port 80 partly
> for the precise purpose of not getting blocked by firewalls.
What exactly makes sending bytes over port 80 more secure than over any
other port? It has always
Paul Rubin wrote:
Mark Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Supposing I decide to write a server-side application using something
like corba or pyro.
Usually you wouldn't run a public corba or pyro service over the
internet. You'd use something like XMLRPC over HTTP port 80 partly
for the precise p
Mark Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Supposing I decide to write a server-side application using something
> like corba or pyro.
>
> What's the chance that in big corporations, the client's ports (in
> both senses of the word: fee-paying, and application) will be blocked,
> thereby immediatel
13 matches
Mail list logo
