On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 22:06:09 -0400, Seymore4Head wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 01:46:37 + (UTC), Denis McMahon
> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:02:31 -0400, Seymore4Head wrote:
>>
>>> For the record, I don't want a hint. I want the answer.
>>> I see a practice question is similar to this.
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 9:58:11 PM UTC+5:30, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > So pushing beginners away from print can push them up the learning
> > curve more quickly
> Or more quickly discourage them. I still use print for all sorts of
> thin
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> So pushing beginners away from print can push them up the learning
> curve more quickly
Or more quickly discourage them. I still use print for all sorts of
things. In my opinion, there is often no need for fancy loggers,
str.format, or the wri
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> The issue is not only that print is bad but that the interpreter is
> good for learning and trying out.
>
> Are these two really unconnected. Lets see... One can
>
> - use print without the interpreter
> - use the interpreter without print
> - u
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014 2:19:39 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I have fewer issues with your conclusion and analogy than I do with the
> basic premise that there is a connection between Seymore's problem here
> and the use, or non-use, of print in the interactive interpreter. I don't
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>With two numbers, 15 and 30, all you really need is five test cases:
My solution assumed integers also, but after I posted it, I thought:
"What about floating points?"
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:18:13 -0400, Seymore4He
On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:18:13 -0400, Seymore4Head wrote:
> I think I get it now. You are using a sample of answers. So you could
> actually just run through them all. (I haven't tried this yet)
>
> for x in range(lo,hi)
> print((15 <= x < 30) == (15<= x and x <30))
Yes, except using print
On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:07:50 -0400, Seymore4Head wrote:
> Here is the exact question, I was trying to post something similar. I
> failed.
>
> http://i.imgur.com/iUGh4xf.jpg
Please don't post screen shots if you can avoid it. You almost certainly
can copy and paste the text from the web page. A
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 01:46:37 + (UTC), Denis McMahon
wrote:
>On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:02:31 -0400, Seymore4Head wrote:
>
>> For the record, I don't want a hint. I want the answer.
>> I see a practice question is similar to this.
>> 15 <= x < 30 And it wants a similar expression that is equivale
On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:02:31 -0400, Seymore4Head wrote:
> For the record, I don't want a hint. I want the answer.
> I see a practice question is similar to this.
> 15 <= x < 30 And it wants a similar expression that is equivalent.
I think part of the problem here is that you don't understand th
> On Oct 6, 2014, at 4:49 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:05:40 -0700, Rustom Mody wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday, October 6, 2014 10:22:27 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
Consider the sequence:
1. Drives on th
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:05:40 -0700, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Monday, October 6, 2014 10:22:27 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>> > Consider the sequence:
>> > 1. Drives on the wrong side of the road 2. Has no clue that there's
>> > such a con
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Monday, October 6, 2014 10:22:27 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>> > Consider the sequence:
>> > 1. Drives on the wrong side of the road
>> > 2. Has no clue that there's such a concept
On Monday, October 6, 2014 10:22:27 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > Consider the sequence:
> > 1. Drives on the wrong side of the road
> > 2. Has no clue that there's such a concept as 'wrong side of road'
> > 3. Teaches people to drive wi
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> Consider the sequence:
>
> 1. Drives on the wrong side of the road
> 2. Has no clue that there's such a concept as 'wrong side of road'
> 3. Teaches people to drive without conveying anything about 'wrong side of
> road'
>
> Hopefully you will
On Monday, October 6, 2014 6:34:27 PM UTC+5:30, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > Sorry Seymore if this sounds condescending -- its not a complaint
> > against you but against those who treat the print statement/expression as
> > kosher for newbies.
>
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> Sorry Seymore if this sounds condescending -- its not a complaint
> against you but against those who treat the print statement/expression as
> kosher for newbies.
So if you're not griping about Seymore's original post, are you
griping about my
14 wrote:
> On 10/5/14 7:02 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
>>
>> For the record, I don't want a hint. I want the answer.
>> I see a practice question is similar to this.
>> 15 <= x < 30 And it wants a similar expression that is equivalent.
>> So the right answer is 15<= x or x <30
>
>
> No, "15 <= x < 3
On Monday, October 6, 2014 5:04:11 AM UTC+5:30, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2014 6:07 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
> > For the record, I don't want a hint. I want the answer.
> > I see a practice question is similar to this.
> > 15 <= x < 30 And it wants a similar expression that is equivalent.
On 10/5/14 8:07 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:14:27 -0400, Ned Batchelder
wrote:
On 10/5/14 7:02 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
For the record, I don't want a hint. I want the answer.
I see a practice question is similar to this.
15 <= x < 30 And it wants a similar expression that
On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:47:40 -0400, Terry Reedy
wrote:
>On 10/5/2014 7:02 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
>> For the record, I don't want a hint. I want the answer.
>> I see a practice question is similar to this.
>> 15 <= x < 30 And it wants a similar expression that is equivalent.
>> So the right ans
On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:14:27 -0400, Ned Batchelder
wrote:
>On 10/5/14 7:02 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
>> For the record, I don't want a hint. I want the answer.
>> I see a practice question is similar to this.
>> 15 <= x < 30 And it wants a similar expression that is equivalent.
>> So the right an
On 10/5/2014 7:02 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
For the record, I don't want a hint. I want the answer.
I see a practice question is similar to this.
15 <= x < 30 And it wants a similar expression that is equivalent.
So the right answer is 15<= x or x <30
but one of the other answers is
not (15<= x a
On Oct 5, 2014 6:07 PM, "Seymore4Head" wrote:
>
> For the record, I don't want a hint. I want the answer.
> I see a practice question is similar to this.
> 15 <= x < 30 And it wants a similar expression that is equivalent.
Maybe
30 > x >= 15
? Seems more "similar" to the original expressi
On 10/5/14 7:02 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
For the record, I don't want a hint. I want the answer.
I see a practice question is similar to this.
15 <= x < 30 And it wants a similar expression that is equivalent.
So the right answer is 15<= x or x <30
No, "15 <= x < 30" is equivalent to "15 <= x
In article ,
Seymore4Head wrote:
> For the record, I don't want a hint. I want the answer.
42.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
26 matches
Mail list logo
