ast wrote:
> Since try() is a callback function called when a button is pushed,
> with the effect to open a dialog, I tried to define MyDialog class
> inside try(). The program is the following and it works. I no
> longer need to define test as global.
> Is it a good practice to define a class in
"Steven D'Aprano" a écrit dans le message de
news:54898820$0$12989$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com...
You can make "test" global by declaring it global:
def try_():
global test
test = True
setup = MyDialog(root)
If that solves your problem to your satisfaction, you can stop r
"Steven D'Aprano" a écrit dans le message de
news:54898820$0$12989$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com...
As I said, most programming languages work like this. But a small minority
use a different system, called "dynamic scoping". In dynamic scoping, it
doesn't matter *where* a function is d
ast wrote:
> Hello
>
> I provide two almost identical small test case programs.
> The first one works as expected, 'True' is printed on the
> console.
> With the second one Python complains that 'test' is not
> known. I dont understand why.
> #
> ## Second
>
