[JanC]
> The code below makes it possible to write assembler code for
different
> architectures (in case pyasm ever supports that ;) and also a Python
> code version to use when running on a system where no assembler code
> can be used. It prints:
[Michael]
> Another (perhaps wacky) approach woul
JanC wrote:
[an example of using decorators to control pyasm]
Another (perhaps wacky) approach would be to change the assembler source syntax
enough to make it legal Python - in particular, this means parenthesizing the
arguments - then it can just be stored in-line with other Python source. Thi
Stefan Behnel schreef:
> Meaning: Put the assembler into the doc-string of a function. Then
> use a decorator to run the assembler on the function's __doc__ string
> and build an assembly function that takes the same arguments to make
> the assembly function directly callable.
That would 'disa
I haven't checked PyPy out lately. I was under the impression the
Pyrex/C backend was still doing static compilation. Guess I'll have to
take a look.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Won't docstrings be removed in optimised bytecode ? that would stuff
things up.
Regards,
Fuzzy
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/index.shtml
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 10 Mar 2005 12:35:36 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Roger,
>
> I didn't realize that Stefan replied to the list and sent a private
> email reply. There seemed to be a lag in google groups today. I
> basically told him that I might be crazy enough to write an assembl
Hey Roger,
I didn't realize that Stefan replied to the list and sent a private
email reply. There seemed to be a lag in google groups today. I
basically told him that I might be crazy enough to write an assembler
in python, but I'm not crazy enough to start using those function
decorators.
I'm
"Stefan Behnel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Meaning: Put the assembler into the doc-string of a function.
That has several issues. One is that you can't do string operations with
it. Say you wanted some %d, %s etc in the string. If you use a documentation
gene
Hi!
What about an interface like this:
--
@pyasm
def hello_world(*some_args):
"""
!CHARS hello_str 'Hello world!\n\0'
!PROC hello_world PYTHON
!ARG self
!ARG args
PUSH hello_str
CALL PySys_WriteStdout
ADD ESP, 0x4
>
> #
> ## helloWorld.py
> ## assembly hello world script
> #
DOH! The example file got truncated. Here it is.
#
## helloWorld.py
## assembly hello world script
#
fro
10 matches
Mail list logo
