Am 04.02.10 01:52, schrieb Steve Holden:
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
Am 03.02.10 22:46, schrieb soltys:
Hi Everybody,
I've been doing some test on pythons' virtualenv and recently I've
decided to run PyChecker. But I'm having some difficulties with importing
modules available only on virtualenv by
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> Am 03.02.10 22:46, schrieb soltys:
>> Hi Everybody,
>> I've been doing some test on pythons' virtualenv and recently I've
>> decided to run PyChecker. But I'm having some difficulties with importing
>> modules available only on virtualenv by pychecker. As if it was
>> tryi
Am 03.02.10 22:46, schrieb soltys:
Hi Everybody,
I've been doing some test on pythons' virtualenv and recently I've
decided to run PyChecker. But I'm having some difficulties with importing
modules available only on virtualenv by pychecker. As if it was
trying to use systemwide python.
I've googl
On Fri, 09 Jun 2006 11:46:59 -0700, Matt Good wrote:
> Anthony Greene wrote:
>> Howdy, I had the impression that pychecker caught and reported such
>> dynamic syntactical errors.
>>
>> #!/usr/bin/env python
>>
>>
>> def add(i):
>> i += 10
>>
>> status = 3
>>
>> if 1 == 1:
>> statuss = 15
>
Rick> I think you're asking a lot from pychecker.
Rick> kop = 1
Rick> koi = 2
Rick> if True:
Rick> koo = 3
Rick> What would you like pychecker to report?
I thing the OP was hoping for a "not used" error, but it can only reasonably
do that within a function, which
Anthony Greene wrote:
> Howdy, I had the impression that pychecker caught and reported such
> dynamic syntactical errors.
>
> #!/usr/bin/env python
>
>
> def add(i):
> i += 10
>
> status = 3
>
> if 1 == 1:
> statuss = 15
>
> add(status)
>
> ===
>
> exalted sysfault$ pych
Anthony Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Howdy, I had the impression that pychecker caught and reported such
> dynamic syntactical errors.
>
> #!/usr/bin/env python
>
>
> def add(i):
> i += 10
>
> status = 3
>
> if 1 == 1:
> statuss = 15
>
> add(stat
Roman Suzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Chris McCoy wrote:
>>> gridSystemId = [[None]*columns]*rows
>> You've made gridSystemID a list of `rows` references to the SAME "inner"
>> list, so the behavior you observe is the only possible one.
>> If you want copies instead, ASK for
It may, but I haven't been using Pychecker yet. I'm still fairly new to
Python.
Thanks,
Chris M.
"Roman Suzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Chris McCoy wrote:
>
>> Thank you! I've been banging my head against the wall!
>>
>> Chris M.
>
>>> g
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> Special thanks to Ken Pronovici. He did a lot of work for this
> release and helped ensure it occurred.
>
> Version 0.8.15 of PyChecker is available. It's been over a year since
> the last release. Wow, time really does fly. Since it's been so long
> I'm sure I screwed so
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ben Sizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>But you could use a dict of return values, or even just assigning a
>different return value in each if clause. The end result is that you
>have a single well-defined exit point from the function, which is
>generally considered to
Peter Otten wrote:
The Set class has implementations for __cmp__() and __hash__() that
unconditionally raise an exception. pychecker assumes that these methods
are "abstract", i. e. meant to be overriden by a subclass, and warns that
you are instantiating an abstract base class, while the intention
"Ben Sizer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But you could use a dict of return values, or even just assigning a
different return value in each if clause. The end result is that you
have a single well-defined exit point from the function, which is
generally considered to
But you could use a dict of return values, or even just assigning a
different return value in each if clause. The end result is that you
have a single well-defined exit point from the function, which is
generally considered to be preferable.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I don't know pychecker, maybe there's something wrong with it as your
code seems valid to me.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Istvan Albert wrote:
> if I have this code:
>
> import sets
>
> class Foo:
> x = sets.Set()
>
> then pychecker says:
>
> test.py:4: Methods (__cmp__, __hash__) in sets.Set need to be overridden
> in a subclass
>
> I don't get this message. What is it trying to say, and why?
The minimal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<__main__.Foo instance at 0x00C578A0> Set([])
on 2.4. on WinXP. What environment do you run in?
I'm running it on cygwin,
but still don't get it, why the warning?
Istvan.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
mport sets
class Foo:
def __init__(self):
self.x = sets.Set()
x = Foo()
print x, getattr(x, 'x')
gives for me:
<__main__.Foo instance at 0x00C578A0> Set([])
on 2.4. on WinXP. What environment do you run in?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Roger Binns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
.
.
>> runner.py:200: Function (detectMimeType) has too many returns (11)
>>
>> The function is simply a long "else-if" clause, branching out to different
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:54:54 +, Frans Englich wrote:
> Hello,
Hi
> I take PyChecker partly as an recommender of good coding practice
You may alos be interested by Pylint [1].
Pylint is less advanced in bug detection than pychecker, but imho its good
coding practice detection is more advan
Frans Englich wrote:
Hello,
I take PyChecker partly as an recommender of good coding practice, but I
cannot make sense of some of the messages. For example:
runner.py:878: Function (main) has too many lines (201)
What does this mean? Cannot functions be large? Or is it simply an advice that
func
> runner.py:878: Function (main) has too many lines (201)
>
> What does this mean? Cannot functions be large? Or is it simply an advice that
> functions should be small and simple?
It is advice.
> runner.py:200: Function (detectMimeType) has too many returns (11)
>
> The function is simply a long
Frans Englich wrote:
Also, another newbie question: How does one make a string stretch over several
lines in the source code? Is this the proper way?
(1)
print "asda asda asda asda asda asda " \
"asda asda asda asda asda asda " \
"asda asda asda asda asda asda"
A couple of other op
23 matches
Mail list logo
