-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> RHEL supports Python 3, it just doesn't provide Python 3.
True, but as you say later, the only method is to recompile. So, if I want
to use Python 3 in a production environment like RHEL, I need:
- A development environmen
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:16:30 +0100, Enrico 'Henryx' Bianchi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tobiah wrote:
>
>> Use the newer version and don't look back.
>
> Interesting reply, but if I have a platform wich doesn't support Python
> 3 (e.g. RHEL 5.x)? ]:)
RHEL suppo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tobiah wrote:
> Use the newer version and don't look back.
Interesting reply, but if I have a platform wich doesn't support Python 3
(e.g. RHEL 5.x)? ]:)
Enrico
P.S. note that: I *don't* want to recompile Python in production environment
-BEGIN
What is the opinion of the wizards here, shall I learm Python 2 or
Python 3? I'm posting this here because I feel that this point is
interesting to other students of Python.
Use the newer version and don't look back.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 05:54:19 +0200, Antti J Ylikoski wrote:
> I'm in the process of learning Python. I already can code
> objet-oriented programs with the language. I have in my hands the
> O'Reilly book by Mark Lutz, Programming Python, in two versions: the 2nd
> Edition, which covers Python 2,
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> For anyone working with unicode instead of ascii...
Which, frankly, should be everyone. You can't get away with assuming
that a character is a byte any more; even if you stick to the US,
you're going to run into some non-ASCII symbols sooner or
On 12/3/2011 3:59 PM, Gelonida N wrote:
I would still stick with python 2.
In my opinion there is no reason to rush to the most recent version.
Python 3 is 3 years old. Starting with it now is hardly rushing.
There are several reasons someone 'in the process of learning Python'
might want to
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Gelonida N wrote:
> if you write code nicely enough in python 2, then you can translate it
> to python 3. autmatically.
It's entirely possible to write code that can run on both Python 2 and
Python 3 - at least, if you can target 2.6/2.7 and get the
appropriate f
On 12/03/2011 04:54 AM, Antti J Ylikoski wrote:
>
> I'm in the process of learning Python. I already can code
> objet-oriented programs with the language. I have in my hands the
> O'Reilly book by Mark Lutz, Programming Python, in two versions: the
> 2nd Edition, which covers Python 2, and the 4
On 3 December 2011 03:54, Antti J Ylikoski wrote:
>
> I'm in the process of learning Python. I already can code
> objet-oriented programs with the language. I have in my hands the
> O'Reilly book by Mark Lutz, Programming Python, in two versions: the
> 2nd Edition, which covers Python 2, and the
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> If you can deal with the difference between these two lines without
> getting confused:
>
> print md5.md5("spam").hexdigest() # Python 2.x
> print(hashlib.md5("spam").hexdigest()) # Python 3.x
The second line needs to be:
print(hashlib.md
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 05:54:19 +0200, Antti J Ylikoski wrote:
> The O'Reilly book has some 1200 pages. I would not want to invest such
> an amount of work and time to an obsolete language (i. e. Python 2).
Python 2 is not an obsolete language. The differences between Python 2
and Python 3 are min
On 3 déc, 04:54, Antti J Ylikoski wrote:
> Helsinki, Finland, the EU <<<
>>> sys.version
'2.7.2 (default, Jun 12 2011, 15:08:59) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]'
>>> 'éléphant'
'\xe9l\xe9phant'
>>>
>>> sys.version
'3.2.2 (default, Sep 4 2011, 09:51:08) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]'
>>>
2 without a doubt.
On Dec 3, 2011 5:40 PM, "Andrew Berg" wrote:
> On 12/3/2011 12:23 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > PyPy has a roadmap for 3.2
> > http://pypy.org/py3donate.html
> > They definitely plan to do it one way or another.
> I never said there were no plans, but at $2567 out of $60k, I don't
I accidentally quoted the wrong figure. I meant $4369 of $105000.
--
CPython 3.2.2 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17640 | Thunderbird 7.0
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 12/3/2011 12:23 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> PyPy has a roadmap for 3.2
> http://pypy.org/py3donate.html
> They definitely plan to do it one way or another.
I never said there were no plans, but at $2567 out of $60k, I don't see
it happening soon. Unless someone decides to donate a huge sum of money
On 12/2/2011 11:20 PM, Andrew Berg wrote:
thing to note is that, at least AFAICT, Jython, IronPython and PyPy are
not going to support Python 3 any time soon,
PyPy has a roadmap for 3.2
http://pypy.org/py3donate.html
They definitely plan to do it one way or another.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
htt
On 12/2/11, Antti J Ylikoski wrote:
>
> I'm in the process of learning Python. I already can code
> objet-oriented programs with the language. I have in my hands the
> O'Reilly book by Mark Lutz, Programming Python, in two versions: the
> 2nd Edition, which covers Python 2, and the 4th edition,
In article ,
Antti J Ylikoski wrote:
> I have in my hands the O'Reilly book by Mark Lutz, Programming
> Python, in two versions: the 2nd Edition, which covers Python 2, and
> the 4th edition, which covers Python 3.
The engineer in me really has to wonder what the 3rd edition might have
cover
On 12/2/2011 9:54 PM, Antti J Ylikoski wrote:
> What is the opinion of the wizards here, shall I learm Python 2 or
> Python 3? I'm posting this here because I feel that this point is
> interesting to other students of Python.
Unless you are tied to Python 2 in some way, go for Python 3 and don't
l
If you are writing your own scripts, I would recommend Py3 for learning. But if
you are studying existing scripts to learn, Py2 might be better.
I have been doing Python for about 2 years and started learning Py3 with no
regrets. Py2 is not going to be "obsolete" for quite a while. It is almost
On Feb 21, 11:01 pm, Sumit wrote:
> Python 2 or 3 ? with Django , My SQL and YUI
>
> For a web project We have decided to work on Python 2 or 3 ? with
> Django , My SQL and YUI, and this would be the first time to work with
> Python, just now I explored a little and found Python -2 vs 3 Stuff ,
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
