Looks like the 2/3 topic has lain fallow for a couple of days, gotta keep it
burning…
I’m a relatively recent python convert, but been coding and talking to others
about coding for many moons on this big blue orb. I think the industrial side
of this debate has been talked up quite a bit. We
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Travis Griggs travisgri...@gmail.comwrote:
Being a fan of JIT, I have big hopes for PyPy, I can’t figure out why they
aren’t pitching their “cutting edge” interpreter, for the “cutting edge”
version of python. There should be a wall of superpowers/shame for
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Travis Griggs travisgri...@gmail.com wrote:
I’ve had a bunch of interns around me lately though, wanting to get into
python, and this is where I find the momentum really breaks down. If
newcomers go to take an online course in python, they might try MIT’s Open
On Friday, January 17, 2014 6:03:45 PM UTC-5, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 1/17/2014 5:16 PM, beliav...@aol.com wrote:
Python 2 and 3 are incompatible in ways that do not apply to Fortran
standards pre- and post- F77.
As stated above, I disagree with respect to pre-F77 and F77. Did you
On 2014-01-14, Staszek nore...@eisenbits.com wrote:
What's the problem with Python 3.x?
The problem with Python 3.x is Python 2.7. ;)
What's wrong?...
Python 2.7 still does everything 99% of us need to do, and we're too
lazy to switch.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards
On 2014-01-17 15:27, Grant Edwards wrote:
What's wrong?...
Python 2.7 still does everything 99% of us need to do, and we're too
lazy to switch.
And in most distros, typing python invokes 2.x, and explicitly
typing python3 is almost 17% longer. We're a lazy bunch! :-)
-tkc
--
On 17/01/2014 16:15, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2014-01-17 15:27, Grant Edwards wrote:
What's wrong?...
Python 2.7 still does everything 99% of us need to do, and we're too
lazy to switch.
And in most distros, typing python invokes 2.x, and explicitly
typing python3 is almost 17% longer. We're a
On 2014-01-17, Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
On 2014-01-17 15:27, Grant Edwards wrote:
What's wrong?...
Python 2.7 still does everything 99% of us need to do, and we're too
lazy to switch.
And in most distros, typing python invokes 2.x, and explicitly
typing python3 is
On 1/17/2014 10:27 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2014-01-14, Staszek nore...@eisenbits.com wrote:
What's the problem with Python 3.x?
The problem with Python 3.x is Python 2.7. ;)
Cute.
What's wrong?...
Python 2.7 still does everything 99% of us need to do, and we're too
lazy to switch.
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 2:38:29 PM UTC-5, Skip Montanaro wrote:
What's the problem with Python 3.x? It was first released in 2008, but
web hosting companies still seem to offer Python 2.x rather.
For example, Google App Engine only offers Python 2.7.
What's wrong?...
On 17/01/2014 22:16, beliav...@aol.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 2:38:29 PM UTC-5, Skip Montanaro wrote:
What's the problem with Python 3.x? It was first released in 2008, but
web hosting companies still seem to offer Python 2.x rather.
For example, Google App Engine only
On 1/17/2014 5:16 PM, beliav...@aol.com wrote:
I don't think the Fortran analogy is valid.
The appropriate analogy for the changes between Python 2.x and 3.x,
which started about 1 and 2 decades after the original Python, are the
changes between Fortran IV/66 and Fortran 77, also about 1
On 2014-01-17 23:03, Terry Reedy wrote:
[snip]
Since 3.0, we have added new syntax ('yield from', u'' for instance) but
I do not believe we have deleted or changed any syntax (I might have
forgotten something minor) and I do not know of any proposal to do so
(except to re-delete u'', which
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:12 AM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
On 2014-01-17 23:03, Terry Reedy wrote:
[snip]
Since 3.0, we have added new syntax ('yield from', u'' for instance) but
I do not believe we have deleted or changed any syntax (I might have
forgotten something minor) and
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu writes:
Since 3.0, we have added new syntax ('yield from', u'' for instance)
but I do not believe we have deleted or changed any syntax (I might
have forgotten something minor)
I'm aware of the removal of ‘`foo`’ (use ‘repr(foo)’ instead), and
removal of ‘except
Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu writes:
Since 3.0, we have added new syntax ('yield from', u'' for instance)
but I do not believe we have deleted or changed any syntax (I might
have forgotten something minor)
I'm aware of the removal of ‘`foo`’
In article lbc296$itl$1...@reader1.panix.com,
Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 2014-01-17, Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
On 2014-01-17 15:27, Grant Edwards wrote:
What's wrong?...
Python 2.7 still does everything 99% of us need to do, and we're too
Travis Griggs travisgri...@gmail.com writes:
Personally, I wish they’d start python4, sure would take the heat out of
the 3 vs 2 debates. And maybe there’d be a program called twentyfour as
a result.
twelve would be sufficient, I would think.
--
Piet van Oostrum p...@vanoostrum.org
WWW:
Here we go again…
On Jan 14, 2014, at 11:33 AM, Staszek nore...@eisenbits.com wrote:
Hi
What's the problem with Python 3.x? It was first released in 2008, but
web hosting companies still seem to offer Python 2.x rather.
For example, Google App Engine only offers Python 2.7.
What's
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Travis Griggs travisgri...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, I wish they’d start python4, sure would take the heat out of the
3 vs 2 debates. And maybe there’d be a program called twentyfour as a result.
Learn All Current Versions of Python in Twenty-Four Hours?
On 15/01/2014 16:14, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Travis Griggs travisgri...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, I wish they’d start python4, sure would take the heat out of the 3
vs 2 debates. And maybe there’d be a program called twentyfour as a result.
Learn All Current
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 15/01/2014 16:14, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Travis Griggs travisgri...@gmail.com
wrote:
Personally, I wish they’d start python4, sure would take the heat out of
the 3 vs 2 debates.
On 01/14/2014 01:33 PM, Staszek wrote:
Hi
What's the problem with Python 3.x? It was first released in 2008, but
web hosting companies still seem to offer Python 2.x rather.
For example, Google App Engine only offers Python 2.7.
What's wrong?...
My last two hosts have offered multiple
What's the problem with Python 3.x? It was first released in 2008, but
web hosting companies still seem to offer Python 2.x rather.
For example, Google App Engine only offers Python 2.7.
What's wrong?...
What makes you think anything's wrong? Major changes to any
established piece of
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Staszek nore...@eisenbits.com wrote:
What's the problem with Python 3.x? It was first released in 2008, but
web hosting companies still seem to offer Python 2.x rather.
For example, Google App Engine only offers Python 2.7.
What's wrong?...
There's nothing
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:33:50 +0100, Staszek wrote:
Hi
What's the problem with Python 3.x?
Nothing.
It was first released in 2008,
That was only five years ago.
I know that to young kids today who change their iPhone every six months,
five years sounds like a lot, but in the world of
On 2014-01-15 02:55, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:33:50 +0100, Staszek wrote:
Hi
What's the problem with Python 3.x?
Nothing.
It was first released in 2008,
That was only five years ago.
I know that to young kids today who change their iPhone every six months,
five
27 matches
Mail list logo
