Re: Python interpreter in Basic or a Python-2-Basic translator.

2005-05-02 Thread rrr
On 1 May 2005 at 6:18, Engineer wrote: > The security 'droids have decided that since the MS Office Suite is a > "standard" application then software written in MS Office VBA must be > "safe." Any other development environments (such as Java, Perl, > Cygwin) are "unsafe" and can't be installed.

Re: Python interpreter in Basic or a Python-2-Basic translator.

2005-05-01 Thread Jeremy Bowers
On Sun, 01 May 2005 06:18:27 -0700, Engineer wrote: > The security 'droids have decided that since the MS Office Suite is a > "standard" application then software written in MS Office VBA must be > "safe." "Melissa". (Google hint: "Virus".) Given the brazen stupidity demonstrated by these decisio

Re: Python interpreter in Basic or a Python-2-Basic translator.

2005-05-01 Thread Do Re Mi chel La Si Do
Hi ! VBA is at the end of his lifetime. The next MS-Office will not have VBA (because dotNet). You should really adopt Python. @-salutations -- Michel Claveau -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Python interpreter in Basic or a Python-2-Basic translator.

2005-05-01 Thread Larry Bates
I don't think this is going to happen. Applications that drive MS Office applications merely call COM objects that perform the actual operations. It doesn't really matter what language calls the COM objects, they are the same objects all the time. If they don't like the "installation" of the Pyt