In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Boris Borcic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roy Smith wrote:
> > and all three keywords are verbs, so when you describe the code, you can
> > use the same English words as in the program source, "You try to execute
> > some code, but it throws a foo, which is caug
Roy Smith wrote:
> I noticed something interesting today. In C++, you write:
>
> try {
>throw foo;
> } catch {
> }
>
> and all three keywords are verbs, so when you describe the code, you can
> use the same English words as in the program source, "You try to execute
> some code, but it thr
defcon8 wrote:
> 1. Does it matter?
> 2. Is it affecting your productivity.
> 3. Are you not trying to programme?
> 4. It is open source, change it and stop whining.
>
What about trying emacs +x doctor ?
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]
1. Does it matter?
2. Is it affecting your productivity.
3. Are you not trying to programme?
4. It is open source, change it and stop whining.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Roy Smith wrote:
> try {
>throw foo;
> } catch {
> }
> try:
>raise foo
> except:
But which one is prettier? ;)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Roy Smith wrote:
> I noticed something interesting today. In C++, you write:
>
> try {
>throw foo;
> } catch {
> }
>
> and all three keywords are verbs, so when you describe the code, you can
> use the same English words as in the program source, "You try to execute
> some code, but it thr
I'm not a english speaker, so I just accepted it...;
I understood it as :
'Try' allways to execute this code, 'except' when it doesn't work do
this
> I noticed something interesting today. In C++, you write:
>
> try {
>throw foo;
> } catch {
> }
>
> and all three keywords are verbs, so
