John Nagle a écrit :
(snip)
MySQLdb is available only up to Python 2.5.
Huh ???
Python 2.6.2 (release26-maint, Apr 19 2009, 01:56:41)
[GCC 4.3.3] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import MySQLdb
/var/lib/python-support/python2.6/MySQLdb/__in
Ed Singleton a écrit :
On Aug 26, 4:17 am, alex23 wrote:
Frameworks created for the sake of creating a framework, as opposed to
those written to meet a defined need, tend to be the worst examples of
masturbatory coding.
Indeed, but masturbation is perfectly healthy and acceptable, and we
all
On Aug 26, 4:17 am, alex23 wrote:
> Frameworks created for the sake of creating a framework, as opposed to
> those written to meet a defined need, tend to be the worst examples of
> masturbatory coding.
Indeed, but masturbation is perfectly healthy and acceptable, and we
all do it every now and t
John Nagle a écrit :
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>> If you're only writing your framework for learning purposes, you could
>> as well go with Python 3, and implement everything from the ground up
>> (not a trivial task FWIW).
>
>Python 3 isn't ready for prime time on web servers. Too many ma
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
If you're only writing your framework for learning purposes, you could
as well go with Python 3, and implement everything from the ground up
(not a trivial task FWIW).
Python 3 isn't ready for prime time on web servers. Too many major modules,
haven't been ported
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
A few additional comments on top of what others have said.
On Aug 26, 11:09 am, Phil wrote:
As I've read elsewhere, "These days, FastCGI is never used directly.
Actually, FCGI works quite well. Sitetruth's AdRater
(http://www.sitetruth.com/downloads/adrater.html)
Phil a écrit :
When
I gave that arbitrary percentage, I was basing it off of the
information I had seen with regards to launching applications built
with existing frameworks using lighttpd. I do realize I was missing a
lot of information by looking up something that specific.
Indeed !-)
I al
Haha. While I don't disagree with you, I seem to be under the
impression that you think I haven't been reading the web where nearly
every blog post complains about the abundance of Python frameworks.
The thing is, most of the frameworks being commented on in such a way
are 'microframeworks' that pr
In article ,
Phil wrote:
>
>My interest in Python 3.1 was actually to develop a framework. Again,
>I can feel the flames. :) I understand there are enough frameworks but
>I actually have no applications that I wish to develop. I enjoy
>developing these kinds of things from scratch as a learning
>
Thanks Graham. I actually ended up reading that blog post from a
Google search last night before I saw your response. It was very
informative.
Bruno, I will take a look at those groups to expand my knowledge. When
I gave that arbitrary percentage, I was basing it off of the
information I had seen
Phil a écrit :
(snip)
However, 99.9% of the discussion I see with Python on
the web is around FCGI.
May I suggest you spend some time reading django-users and django-dev on
google groups ? (and that's only *one* of the way-too-many Python web
frameworks).
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/li
On Aug 27, 1:02 pm, Phil wrote:
> Thanks a lot for another response. I've never posted in groups like
> this before but the results are amazing.
>
> I will definitely consider trying mod_wsgi when I get a chance. I like
> the approach taken with it. It is unfortunate that I completely missed
> all
Thanks a lot for another response. I've never posted in groups like
this before but the results are amazing.
I will definitely consider trying mod_wsgi when I get a chance. I like
the approach taken with it. It is unfortunate that I completely missed
all Apache related material because I was using
On Aug 27, 2:54 am, Phil wrote:
> Thanks to everybody. I believe I am understanding things better.
>
> I have looked at the links that have been provided, although I have
> seen most of them in the past month or so that I've been looking into
> this stuff. I do agree with most of the things Armin
Thanks to everybody. I believe I am understanding things better.
I have looked at the links that have been provided, although I have
seen most of them in the past month or so that I've been looking into
this stuff. I do agree with most of the things Armin stated in that
NIH post. I agree with ever
Phil a écrit :
I've seen lots of web sites explaining everything, but for whatever
reason I seem to not be picking something up.
I am a graphical person, which is probably the reason I haven't found
my answer.
May somebody please confirm if my diagram accurately represents the
stack, generally sp
A few additional comments on top of what others have said.
On Aug 26, 11:09 am, Phil wrote:
> I've seen lots of web sites explaining everything, but for whatever
> reason I seem to not be picking something up.
> I am a graphical person, which is probably the reason I haven't found
> my answer.
>
On Aug 26, 1:17 pm, alex23 wrote:
> Phil wrote:
> > My interest in Python 3.1 was actually to develop a framework. Again,
> > I can feel the flames. :) I understand there are enough frameworks but
> > I actually have no applications that I wish to develop.
>
> No offense intended, but that's prob
On Aug 25, 11:17 pm, alex23 wrote:
> Phil wrote:
> > My interest in Python 3.1 was actually to develop a framework. Again,
> > I can feel the flames. :) I understand there are enough frameworks but
> > I actually have no applications that I wish to develop.
>
> No offense intended, but that's pro
Phil wrote:
> My interest in Python 3.1 was actually to develop a framework. Again,
> I can feel the flames. :) I understand there are enough frameworks but
> I actually have no applications that I wish to develop.
No offense intended, but that's probably the worst approach to take.
Frameworks c
Thank you for the helpful and timely response.
My interest in Python 3.1 was actually to develop a framework. Again,
I can feel the flames. :) I understand there are enough frameworks but
I actually have no applications that I wish to develop. I enjoy
developing these kinds of things from scratch
On 2009-08-25 20:09 PM, Phil wrote:
I've seen lots of web sites explaining everything, but for whatever
reason I seem to not be picking something up.
I am a graphical person, which is probably the reason I haven't found
my answer.
May somebody please confirm if my diagram accurately represents th
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Atul. wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Needless to say I am new to python and web programming. I am looking
> for a quick Python-101 course / tutorial for "using python to
> implement dynamic content on web" under some web server. Any pointers
> what should I be reading?
Go
On Sep 3, 8:41 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SimonPalmer a écrit :
>
> > Apologies in advance if this is either a) the wrong board or b) been
> > answered a million times elsewhere, but...
>
> > I have been given an assignment to get a python module up and running
> > behind
SimonPalmer a écrit :
Apologies in advance if this is either a) the wrong board or b) been
answered a million times elsewhere, but...
I have been given an assignment to get a python module up and running
behind an existing web site. At the moment the rest of the site is
developed in PHP but the
25 matches
Mail list logo
