Thanks for the pointers to appscript, and for the comments on the
page. I have changed the examples at
http://juanreyero.com/article/python/os-x-python.html
to reflect them.
Cheers,
Juan
--
http://juanreyero.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 12/11/09 3:13 AM, joa...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
I've written a short document with some working examples of how to
interface python with other applications in OS-X via applescript (had
to spend some time figuring it out, and thought I might as well write
it down). The examples include a
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> RajNewbie wrote:
> > On Jan 12, 6:51 pm, Tim Chase wrote:
> [a perfectly fine reply which is how I'd solve it]
> >> RajNewbie wrote:
> >>> ... The solution that I had in mind is:
> >>>while True:
> >>> ...
> >>> if : break
> >>> if inifinte_l
RajNewbie wrote:
> But, I still feel it would be much more aesthetically pleasing if I
> can call a single procedure like
> if infinite_loop() -> to do the same.
You may find it aesthetically pleasing, and it may very well be, but it
will obfuscate your code and make it less maintainable.
robert
RajNewbie wrote:
>Is there a way - a python trick - to have a check such that if the
> loop goes for more than x number of steps, it will cause an exception?
>
>I do understand that we can use the code like -
>i = 0
>while True:
> i++
> if i > 200: raise infinite_Loop_Exce
RajNewbie wrote:
On Jan 12, 6:51 pm, Tim Chase wrote:
[a perfectly fine reply which is how I'd solve it]
>> RajNewbie wrote:
... The solution that I had in mind is:
while True:
...
if : break
if inifinte_loop(): raise infiinte_loop_exception
Wherein infinite_loop is a ge
On Jan 13, 12:51 am, Tim Chase took a
walk on the OT side:
> > Could someone chip in with other suggestions?
>
> As an aside: the phrase is "chime in"[1] (to volunteer
> suggestions) "Chip in"[2] usually involves contributing money to
> a common fund ("care to chip in $10 for Sally's wedding gif
RajNewbie writes:
>I do understand that we can use the code like -
>i = 0
>while True:
> i++
> if i > 200: raise infinite_Loop_Exception
> ...
> if : break
>
>But I am not very happy with this code for 3 reasons
I prefer:
from itertools import count
fo
On Jan 12, 6:51 pm, Tim Chase wrote:
> > My code has a lot of while loops of the following format:
> > while True:
> > ...
> > if : break
>
> > The danger with such a code is that it might go to an infinite loop
> > - if the never occurs.
> > Is there a way - a python trick
My code has a lot of while loops of the following format:
while True:
...
if : break
The danger with such a code is that it might go to an infinite loop
- if the never occurs.
Is there a way - a python trick - to have a check such that if the
loop goes for more than x numbe
RajNewbie writes:
> Could someone chip in with other suggestions?
Set up an iterable that will end under the right conditions. Then,
iterate over that with ‘for foo in that_iterable’. This idiom is
usually far more expressive than any tricks with ‘while’ loops and
‘break’ statements.
For tools
11 matches
Mail list logo
