On 2015-03-01 20:32, fl wrote:
Hi,
It is difficult to install numpy package for my PC Windows 7, 64-bit OS. In
the end, I install Enthought Canopy, which is recommended on line because it
does install numpy automatically. Now, I can test it with
import numpy
it succeeds. On http://wiki.scipy.o
On Sunday, March 1, 2015 at 1:25:59 PM UTC-8, Andrea D'Amore wrote:
> On 2015-03-01 20:32:34 +, fl said:
>
> > import numpy
> > it succeeds. On http://wiki.scipy.org/Cookbook, it shows some interesting
> > code example snippet, such as Cookbook / ParticleFilter, Markov chain etc.
>
> > I don'
On 2015-03-01 20:32:34 +, fl said:
import numpy
it succeeds. On http://wiki.scipy.org/Cookbook, it shows some interesting
code example snippet, such as Cookbook / ParticleFilter, Markov chain etc.
I don't know how I can access these code examples, because I don't know where
Enthought Cano
On Jul 15, 11:54 am, guandalino wrote:
> Hi, suppose I have python 2.6.4 installed from source and I want to
> upgrade to 2.6.5. Python standard library is automatically upgraded at
> 2.6.5 as well, while 3rd party pure Python and extension modules in
> site-packages don't. Is it safe to keep the
On Sep 13, 4:25 pm, Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 13, 1:00 am, fishfin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > @ Carl: Yes, I think your right now that I look at it (or at least all
> > except for the last two lines need to be indented). I'm still not sure
> > how to send the stuff to the
fishfin wrote:
@ Carl: Yes, I think your right now that I look at it (or at least all
except for the last two lines need to be indented).
> I'm still not sure
how to send the stuff to the web browser though.
what do you think is the cfile.write() doing?
As a hint, beside having a look at r
On Sep 13, 1:00 am, fishfin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @ Carl: Yes, I think your right now that I look at it (or at least all
> except for the last two lines need to be indented). I'm still not sure
> how to send the stuff to the web browser though. Thanks for pointing
> it out!
Try reading in t
@ Carl: Yes, I think your right now that I look at it (or at least all
except for the last two lines need to be indented). I'm still not sure
how to send the stuff to the web browser though. Thanks for pointing
it out!
@ Diez: I'll start googling those right away.
Carl Banks wrote:
> On Sep 13, 1
On Sep 13, 12:15 am, fishfin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was working through a tutorial about how to write a server using
> python (the url is bellow). I am sure that the server is working to
> some degree because when the server is running localhost:8080 just
> keeps trying to load until it tim
fishfin schrieb:
I was working through a tutorial about how to write a server using
python (the url is bellow). I am sure that the server is working to
some degree because when the server is running localhost:8080 just
keeps trying to load until it times out. I would like to know how to
send info
"Ohad Frand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Hi
| Thanks a lot for your reply
| I think the main uses for it is to study the language and to see that I
| didn't miss anything else or that something is changed from one version
| to another.
The language manual lists
erron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:11 AM
To: Ohad Frand
Cc: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: question about python statements
Ohad Frand wrote:
> Hi Gary
>
> Sorry that I was not clear, I hope that this time I will explain
myself
> better.
>
> I can
st as you did in
your example above?
Just out of curiosity, *why* do you want this list. Perhaps is we knew
that, we could think of a programmatic way to construct the list you
want. The biggest challenge at the moment is that we have no idea what
you mean by statement, but it is certainly n
put', 'reduce', 'reload'...]
But I don't know how to generate the next list of builtin python
statements:
['assert','break','class','continue','def','del','elif','else','except',
&#
"George Sakkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 12, 7:35 pm, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ohad Frand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | I am looking for a way to programmically get a list of all python
> | existin
On May 12, 7:35 pm, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ohad Frand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | I am looking for a way to programmically get a list of all python
> | existing statements that I cannot access by __builtins__ or locals()
> | (like ["asse
"Ohad Frand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| I am looking for a way to programmically get a list of all python
| existing statements that I cannot access by __builtins__ or locals()
| (like ["assert","break","class",...])
You appear to want the keywords that begin s
Ohad Frand wrote:
Hi
I am looking for a way to programmically get a list of all python
existing statements that I cannot access by __builtins__ or locals()
(like ["assert","break","class",…])
Thanks,
Ohad
--
http://
James Stroud wrote:
> I think fink is not detecting the gmp (GNU multiple precision arithmetic
> library) dependency.
>
> Try:
>
> % fink install gmp
>
> Then try building gmpy with /sw/bin/python.
I think I didn't explain myself very well. gmp is already installed in
my computer; when building gm
elventear wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working with Python 2.4.3 built from source courtesy of Fink. So
> far so good, until now. I want to use a module called GMPY
> (http://gmpy.sf.net/). I am able to build correctly the module, but
> once I try to import it I get the following error:
>
> ImportErr
On 2006-05-19 16:19:51 -0500, "elventear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The weird thing is that just for kicks I tried building with Python
> that comes with MacOSX (py2.3) and it works. It builds and it loads
> fine. Anybody have an idea why this would happen? Any ideas how to
> solve this? In the
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 09:11:19 +1000, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 19:19:05 +, Bengt Richter wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:47:07 +1000, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:59:20 -0400, François Pinard wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 19:19:05 +, Bengt Richter wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:47:07 +1000, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:59:20 -0400, François Pinard wrote:
>>
>>> [Peter Hansen]
Mike Meyer wrote:
> Yes. I once grabbed an old program that did
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:47:07 +1000, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:59:20 -0400, François Pinard wrote:
>
>> [Peter Hansen]
>>> Mike Meyer wrote:
>>> > Yes. I once grabbed an old program that did assignments to None. But
>>> > that's always been a bad idea.
>>
>
On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:59:20 -0400, François Pinard wrote:
> [Peter Hansen]
>> Mike Meyer wrote:
>> > Yes. I once grabbed an old program that did assignments to None. But
>> > that's always been a bad idea.
>
>> What was the use case!?
>
> People used to assign None to itself as a keyword argume
[Peter Hansen]
> Mike Meyer wrote:
> > Yes. I once grabbed an old program that did assignments to None. But
> > that's always been a bad idea.
> What was the use case!?
People used to assign None to itself as a keyword argument in function
headers. The goal was to make a local copy of the refere
Mike Meyer wrote:
> Yes. I once grabbed an old program that did assignments to None. But
> that's always been a bad idea.
What was the use case!?
-Peter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Jan Danielsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
> I'd like to ask seasoned Python developers:
> - Are you comfortable in upgrading to the latest version of Python, or
> are you worried about what you have to fix in your existing programs?
No, I'm not worried. The Python developers worry a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jan Danielsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello all,
>
> I recently started using Python, and I must say I like it. Both the
>language and libraries available for it.
>
> Background: I have written an application which I use to keep track
>of my personal econom
Jan Danielsson wrote:
>However, when I look at the various Python modules/libraries, I see
> that there are several versions of them, for different versions of
> python. I've seen everything from "for python 1.5" up to "for python
> 2.4" with all versions in between. This scares me a little bi
Backwards compatibility is addressed in several Python Enhancement
Proposals (PEPs):
http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0005.html
http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0236.html
http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0004.html
http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0291.html
You also may want to check related threads in c.
Jan Danielsson wrote:
>But then it occured to me.. I started writing my program in Java
> pre-1.5. Then came 1.5, I upgraded, and my program would still compile
> and run, though I did get three warnings. The language had changed a
> little bit; I had to assign a type to three arrays. That wasn
Hi,
I would like for all platforms, not just for windows. In any case, the
above two replies about "zipfile" support and "eggs" answer my
question. That's exactly what I was looking for. Thanks for prompt and
useful responses.
Raghu.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
You didn't say what platform, but if it is Windows take a
look at Inno Installer. It is a complete installation
framework that allows you to package everything into a
single setup.exe file. I use a combination of py2exe and
Inno to do my apps that are to be distributed. Nothing
could be simpler.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sure that this question might have come up repeatedly. Companies
> may not want to distribute their python code in source form. Even
> though pyc files are one option, it gets inconvenient to distribute
> bunch of them . If there is some way to bundle pyc fi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sure that this question might have come up repeatedly. Companies
> may not want to distribute their python code in source form. Even
> though pyc files are one option, it gets inconvenient to distribute
> bunch of them . If there is some way to bundle pyc fi
Fouff wrote:
> I have a small question concerning the functions open(...) and file(...)
> with python 2.4
>> The intent is for open() to continue to be preferred for use as a factory
>> function which returns a new file object.
versus
>> The previous spelling, open(), is retained for compatibil
37 matches
Mail list logo
