On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Devin Jeanpierre
wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> However, have you tried using a pipe for them instead of a real file? That
>> would allow you to retrieve the output without needing to pass through a
>> file in the file system. Y
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> However, have you tried using a pipe for them instead of a real file? That
> would allow you to retrieve the output without needing to pass through a
> file in the file system. You can also replace sys.stdout/err with arbitrary
> objects in
F L, 08.05.2012 21:07:
> We are trying to implement our own interactive interpreter in our
> applicationusing an embedded Python interpreter. I was wondering what
> would be the best way to retreive as text the result of executing
> Python code. The text must be exactly the same as it would be in
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:07 AM, F L wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We are trying to implement our own interactive interpreter in our
> application
> using an embedded Python interpreter.
>
> I was wondering what would be the best way to retreive as text the result of
> executing Python code. The tex
On May 8, 2012, at 3:07 PM, F L wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We are trying to implement our own interactive interpreter in our application
> using an embedded Python interpreter.
>
> I was wondering what would be the best way to retreive as text the result of
> executing Python code. The text
