Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-05 Thread Rick Johnson
On Jan 3, 8:42 pm, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote: Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes: On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:54:09 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: It objectifies women. So you claim. I'm sure you have a hundred ready rationalisations for why a joke that

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-05 Thread Rick Johnson
On Jan 3, 8:37 pm, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote: It objectifies women. If you can't see how that's harmful to women, I haven't the stamina to educate you. And import pickle objectifies pickles. It's

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-05 Thread Rick Johnson
On Jan 1, 5:24 pm, Alexander Kapps alex.ka...@web.de wrote: Uh oh, should I really send this? ... Yes. Yes, I should! Sorry, I cannot resists. allow everyone to do import girlfriend I'm betting on a joke, like antigravity only significantly less funny and more sexist. Absolutely not

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-04 Thread Tony Pelletier
Honestly, is this list really what this is all about? I'm bored already... Enough? On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.auwrote: Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes: On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:54:09 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: It

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-04 Thread Rami Chowdhury
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 02:42, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote: I'm sure you have a hundred ready rationalisations for why a joke that has “girlfriend” as a fungible object, together with “car” and “house” as things to mechanically import into one's life, is somehow not objectifying

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-04 Thread Ian Kelly
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Tony Pelletier tony.pellet...@gmail.com wrote: Honestly, is this list really what this is all about?  I'm bored already... Sorry, this list does not exist for your personal entertainment. Maybe you should try YouTube. And no, it's not really about sexism either,

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-04 Thread Ian Kelly
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Tony Pelletier tony.pellet...@gmail.com wrote: That's a rather ironic comment.  Idiot. Really? Which part was ironic? Sorry, this list does not exist for your personal entertainment. Not this one, that's just a statement of fact. Maybe you should try

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-04 Thread Tony Pelletier
I have zero desire to follow the rules of a Python(here's the ironic part. Get it now clever boy?) list when it'd riddled with childish banter that has nothing to do with wait for it. Python? Do I need to explain it any further? I'm done with you and this list

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-04 Thread Ian Kelly
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Tony Pelletier tony.pellet...@gmail.com wrote: I have zero desire to follow the rules of a Python(here's the ironic part. Get it now clever boy?) list when it'd riddled with childish banter that has nothing to do with wait for it.

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-04 Thread PiLS
Le mar, 03 jan 2012 20:28:59, Steven D'Aprano a ploppé: On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 05:08:47 -0800, Ethan Furman wrote: [...] maybe policing uploads is worse than cluttering PyPI's disk space and RSS feed with dumb 1 KB packages. (Matt Chaput) I'd drop the maybe. It's hard enough finding what

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-04 Thread Arnaud Delobelle
On 4 January 2012 20:08, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Tony Pelletier tony.pellet...@gmail.com wrote: I have zero desire to follow the rules of a Python(here's the ironic part. Get it now clever boy?) list when it'd riddled with childish banter that

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-04 Thread Chris Angelico
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 7:48 AM, PiLS p...@invalid.ca wrote: If I nuke a Karmic Koala, will they rat me out to the WWF, to the UNODA, or to both? Neither, actually. We'll be so glad you didn't call it a Karmic Koala Bear that we'll send you three American tourists for free. (They're actually

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-04 Thread HoneyMonster
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:48:36 +, PiLS wrote: If I nuke a Karmic Koala, will they rat me out to the WWF, to the UNODA, or to both? Personally I'd be cheering for you, provided you also took out all the warthogs, hedgehogs, badgers, drakes, efts, fawns, gibbons, herons, ibexes, jackalopes,

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-04 Thread xDog Walker
On Tuesday 2012 January 03 17:28, Steven D'Aprano wrote: Besides, I find it hard to believe that the search facilities on PyPI are so bad that there would be any searches that come up with girlfriend.py or car.py as false positives. Try an author search for D'Aprano. -- I have seen the

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Peter Otten
Lie Ryan wrote: On 01/02/2012 11:20 PM, Peter Otten wrote: Felinx Lee wrote: I have removed those packages (girlfriend and others) from PyPI forever, I apologize for that. The thought police has won :( I think the community has a right to defend themselves against trolls. If it's just

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 08:59:53 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierr...@gmail.com writes: Nonsense. Felinx is free to make sexist jokes, and others are free to howl him down when he does so. PyPI has no obligation to be a platform to amplify anyone's prejudice. A module

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Peter Otten
Ben Finney wrote: The next time someone asks why the ratio of women becoming programmers is disproportionately low, please recall episodes where men here give defenses of jokes that objectify women. What's that? The butterfly effect of diversity? If you want more women in IT go to a local

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Ethan Furman
Peter Otten wrote: Lie Ryan wrote: On 01/02/2012 11:20 PM, Peter Otten wrote: Felinx Lee wrote: I have removed those packages (girlfriend and others) from PyPI forever, I apologize for that. The thought police has won :( I think the community has a right to defend themselves against

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Ben Finney
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes: The joke cuts both ways. This is the Just World fallacy: you're implying that, because the same joke can be applied equally well to women or men, that therefore it is equally harmful. The fallacy is to ignore the fact that the playing

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Ben Finney
Peter Otten __pete...@web.de writes: If you want more women in IT go to a local school and show the girls things they can do with a computer that they find fun and interesting. If you have a daughter try more Lego and less Barbies. I have no objection to doing those things *as well as*

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 05:08:47 -0800, Ethan Furman wrote: [...] maybe policing uploads is worse than cluttering PyPI's disk space and RSS feed with dumb 1 KB packages. (Matt Chaput) I'd drop the maybe. It's hard enough finding what one wants without having to wade through crap. PyPI is

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:57:59 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes: The joke cuts both ways. This is the Just World fallacy: you're implying that, because the same joke can be applied equally well to women or men, that therefore it is

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Ben Finney
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes: On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:57:59 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes: The joke cuts both ways. The fallacy is to ignore the fact that the playing field is not level. I'm not

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:54:09 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes: [...] You're making an assumption there that I don't accept. There is no evidence that it is harmful to *anyone*, men or women. It objectifies women. So you claim. If you

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Chris Angelico
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote: It objectifies women. If you can't see how that's harmful to women, I haven't the stamina to educate you. And import pickle objectifies pickles. It's deplorable how few gherkins become programmers, and I think it's

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Ben Finney
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes: On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:54:09 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: It objectifies women. So you claim. I'm sure you have a hundred ready rationalisations for why a joke that has “girlfriend” as a fungible object, together with “car” and

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Dan Sommers
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:37:24 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote: And import pickle objectifies pickles ... Not quite: import pickle merely readies the machinery that objectifies pickles. In order to objectify a pickle, you have to call pickle.loads: import pickle # get ready to objectify a

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Chris Angelico
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Dan Sommers d...@tombstonezero.net wrote: On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:37:24 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote: And import pickle objectifies pickles ... Not quite:  import pickle merely readies the machinery that objectifies pickles.  In order to objectify a pickle, you

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-03 Thread Ethan Furman
Ben Finney wrote: I have no idea what it would take to persuade you in particular. I do know that the combined privileges of being white, male, not-poor, and English-fluent (and many more privileges, I'm sure) grant both of us the luxury of barely even perceiving the harm done by a pervasive

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-02 Thread Felinx Lee
Hi guys, I am the author of girlfriend module, a serious Python programmer. This project is nothing about sexist or racism, it is just a joke, a famous joke in China, please be cool down. And now, I have removed money, car, house packages from PyPi, and remove their dependences in girlfriend

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-02 Thread Kai Diefenbach
Hi, On 2012-01-02 11:03:25 +, Felinx Lee said: I am the author of girlfriend module, a serious Python programmer. This project is nothing about sexist or racism,  it is just a joke, a famous joke in China, please be cool down. Yeah, quite funny. Why not put this on an own web server?

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-02 Thread Chris Withers
On 02/01/2012 11:03, Felinx Lee wrote: The girlfriend module just depends on workhard module now. I will remove girlfriend module forever if you still think it is a spam or illegal. What is the point of these packages? Why do they exist? Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Batch

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-02 Thread Felinx Lee
I have removed those packages (girlfriend and others) from PyPI forever, I apologize for that. -- Felinx Lee -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-02 Thread Peter Otten
Felinx Lee wrote: I have removed those packages (girlfriend and others) from PyPI forever, I apologize for that. The thought police has won :( -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-02 Thread Felinx Lee
Hi, On 2012-01-02 11:03:25 +, Felinx Lee said: I am the author of girlfriend module, a serious Python programmer. This project is nothing about sexist or racism, it is just a joke, a famous joke in China, please be cool down. Yeah, quite funny. Why not put this on an own web server?

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-02 Thread David Monaghan
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 02:52:06 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierr...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps I'm just slow, but what is sexist about this package? Do you even know what the package does? The dependencies are car, house, and money (and workhard, of course). The joke being that women only care

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-02 Thread Chris Angelico
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Peter Otten __pete...@web.de wrote: Felinx Lee wrote: I have removed those packages (girlfriend and others) from PyPI forever, I apologize for that. The thought police has won :( There's nothing wrong with cracking jokes, but sometimes a large central

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-02 Thread Lie Ryan
On 01/02/2012 11:20 PM, Peter Otten wrote: Felinx Lee wrote: I have removed those packages (girlfriend and others) from PyPI forever, I apologize for that. The thought police has won :( I think the community has a right to defend themselves against trolls. If it's just bad naming, we can

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-02 Thread Ben Finney
Peter Otten __pete...@web.de writes: Felinx Lee wrote: I have removed those packages (girlfriend and others) from PyPI forever, I apologize for that. The thought police has won :( Nonsense. Felinx is free to make sexist jokes, and others are free to howl him down when he does so. PyPI

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-02 Thread Devin Jeanpierre
Nonsense. Felinx is free to make sexist jokes, and others are free to howl him down when he does so. PyPI has no obligation to be a platform to amplify anyone's prejudice. A module named girlfriend won't amplify anyone's prejudice. It is, at that point, just a joke. The punchline is import

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-02 Thread Ben Finney
Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierr...@gmail.com writes: Nonsense. Felinx is free to make sexist jokes, and others are free to howl him down when he does so. PyPI has no obligation to be a platform to amplify anyone's prejudice. A module named girlfriend won't amplify anyone's prejudice. It is,

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-02 Thread Robert Kern
On 1/2/12 8:56 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote: But, hey, inertia. As long as we're trying to make this dude get rid of the offensive part, might as well get rid of the rest too. Why not make him get rid of everything he's written, too? Because that's something that no one desires, nor is it the

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-02 Thread Devin Jeanpierre
Because that's something that no one desires, nor is it the logical conclusion of anything that anyone has expressed here. Please don't invent strawmen. You're right, sorry. I let myself say something dumb. I'll try not to do it again. -- Devin On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Robert Kern

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-01 Thread Robert Kern
On 1/1/12 10:18 PM, Matt Chaput wrote: Someone seems to be spamming PyPI by uploading multiple stupid packages. Not sure if it's some form of advertising spam or just idiocy. Don't know if we should care though... maybe policing uploads is worse than cluttering PyPI's disk space and RSS feed

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-01 Thread Alexander Kapps
Uh oh, should I really send this? ... Yes. Yes, I should! Sorry, I cannot resists. allow everyone to do import girlfriend I'm betting on a joke, like antigravity only significantly less funny and more sexist. Absolutely not funny. I hope that someday people will understand that sexism is

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-01 Thread Devin Jeanpierre
Absolutely not funny. I hope that someday people will understand that sexism is just another form of racism. One can understand that sexism is a terrible thing, and at the same time make sexist jokes. Felinx Lee: Do apologize and rename your package/module or I'm going to make a racist

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-01 Thread Lie Ryan
On 01/02/2012 09:33 AM, Robert Kern wrote: On 1/1/12 10:18 PM, Matt Chaput wrote: Someone seems to be spamming PyPI by uploading multiple stupid packages. Not sure if it's some form of advertising spam or just idiocy. Don't know if we should care though... maybe policing uploads is worse than

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-01 Thread Devin Jeanpierre
Sorry, I lied. It's been a while and I misremembered. The package mentioned in the blog post was removed of the author's free will, and PyPI doesn't police submissions. -- Devin On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierr...@gmail.com wrote: Absolutely not funny. I hope that

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-01 Thread Ben Finney
Alexander Kapps alex.ka...@web.de writes: Absolutely not funny. I hope that someday people will understand that sexism is just another form of racism. That's not right. Racism and sexism are not forms of each other. Instead, racism and sexism are both forms of bigotry. And yes, I agree that

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-01 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au writes: Alexander Kapps alex.ka...@web.de writes: Absolutely not funny. I hope that someday people will understand that sexism is just another form of racism. That's not right. Racism and sexism are not forms of each other. Instead, racism and

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-01 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:24:48 +0100, Alexander Kapps wrote: Uh oh, should I really send this? ... Yes. Yes, I should! Sorry, I cannot resists. allow everyone to do import girlfriend I'm betting on a joke, like antigravity only significantly less funny and more sexist. Absolutely not

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-01 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:12:28 +1100, Lie Ryan wrote: Legitimate python programmer or not, that does not legitimize spamming PyPI. I don't see that half a dozen trivial (pointless) modules should be classified as spam. Personally, I've looked at the modules, and if I were the author, I'd be

Re: Spamming PyPI with stupid packages

2012-01-01 Thread Devin Jeanpierre
Perhaps I'm just slow, but what is sexist about this package? Do you even know what the package does? The dependencies are car, house, and money (and workhard, of course). The joke being that women only care about how wealthy you are. If it's just about naming a package girlfriend, though, I