On May 3, 7:37 am, Matt Nordhoff wrote:
> Uncle Bruce wrote:
> --
I think I've figured it out!
What I was trying to do was to enter the literal strings directly into
the IDLE interpreter. The IDLE interpreter will not accept high
codepoints directly.
However, when I put a defined function in
Uncle Bruce wrote:
> I'm working with Python 2.5.4 and the NLTK (Natural Language
> Toolkit). I'm an experienced programmer, but new to Python.
>
> This question arose when I tried to create a literal in my source code
> for a Unicode codepoint greater than 255. (I also posted this
> question in
On Sun, 03 May 2009 03:43:27 -0700, Uncle Bruce wrote:
> Based on some experimenting I've done, I suspect that the support for
> Unicode literals in ANY encoding isn't really accurate. What seems to
> happen is that there must be an 8-bit mapping between the set of Unicode
> literals and what can
