On 2023-01-31, Alan Gauld wrote:
> On 28/01/2023 21:36, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>
>> Now -- last time I checked the gmane server says posting is prohibited.
>> I used to use gmane as it retrieved directly from the mailing list
>
> I still use gmane but its no posting thing is a pain
On 28/01/2023 21:36, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> Now -- last time I checked the gmane server says posting is prohibited.
> I used to use gmane as it retrieved directly from the mailing list
I still use gmane but its no posting thing is a pain because responding
(or posting new stuff) is a
On 2023-01-31, Anssi Saari wrote:
> Grant Edwards writes:
>
>> No. FWIW, it's the mailing list that's blocking them, not Gmane.
>>
>> That's why I wrote this:
>>
>> https://github.com/GrantEdwards/hybrid-inews
>>
>> It's an inews work-alike that submits most posts via gmanes NNTP
>> server,
Grant Edwards writes:
> No. FWIW, it's the mailing list that's blocking them, not Gmane.
>
> That's why I wrote this:
>
> https://github.com/GrantEdwards/hybrid-inews
>
> It's an inews work-alike that submits most posts via gmanes NNTP
> server, but will deal with particular groups
> (e.g.
On 2023-01-28, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 20:07:44 +, Chris Green declaimed the
> following:
>
>
>>As far as I am aware the mirroring of the Python mailing list on
>>comp.lan.python works perfectly. I love gmane! :-)
>
> Is gmane's gmane.comp.python.general
On 2023-01-28, Chris Green wrote:
> As far as I am aware the mirroring of the Python mailing list on
> comp.lan.python works perfectly. I love gmane! :-)
If gmane stopped working, I'd have to retire and give up on computers.
I supposed I might be able to hammer procmail and mutt into
On 2023-01-29, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2023-01-29 02:09:28 -, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
>> I'm not aware of any significant period in the last twenty-one years
>> that
> [the gateway]
>> hasn't been working. Although sometimes it does feel like it isn't, in
>> that I reply to a
Igor Berger writes:
> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 10:02:57 PM UTC-5, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> Jon Ribbens writes:
>>
>> > On 2023-01-29, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> >> "Peter J. Holzer" writes:
>> >>
>> >>> On 2023-01-27 21:04:58 +, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 10:02:57 PM UTC-5, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> Jon Ribbens writes:
>
> > On 2023-01-29, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> >> "Peter J. Holzer" writes:
> >>
> >>> On 2023-01-27 21:04:58 +, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> mut...@dastardlyhq.com writes:
>
> > Hi
On 2023-01-29 02:09:28 -, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
> I'm not aware of any significant period in the last twenty-one years
> that
[the gateway]
> hasn't been working. Although sometimes it does feel like it isn't, in
> that I reply to a post with an answer and then several other
Jon Ribbens writes:
> On 2023-01-29, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> "Peter J. Holzer" writes:
>>
>>> On 2023-01-27 21:04:58 +, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
mutt...@dastardlyhq.com writes:
> Hi
It looks like you posted this question via Usenet. comp.lang.python is
On 2023-01-29, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> "Peter J. Holzer" writes:
>
>> On 2023-01-27 21:04:58 +, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>> mutt...@dastardlyhq.com writes:
>>>
>>> > Hi
>>>
>>> It looks like you posted this question via Usenet. comp.lang.python is
>>> essentially dead as a Usenet group. It
"Peter J. Holzer" writes:
> On 2023-01-27 21:04:58 +, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> mutt...@dastardlyhq.com writes:
>>
>> > Hi
>>
>> It looks like you posted this question via Usenet. comp.lang.python is
>> essentially dead as a Usenet group. It exists, and gets NNTP versions
>> of mail sent
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 at 12:07, Chris Green wrote:
>
> Chris Green wrote:
> > Jon Ribbens wrote:
> > > On 2023-01-28, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > > > On 2023-01-27 21:04:58 +, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> > > >> It looks like you posted this question via Usenet. comp.lang.python is
> > > >>
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 20:07:44 +, Chris Green declaimed the
following:
>As far as I am aware the mirroring of the Python mailing list on
>comp.lan.python works perfectly. I love gmane! :-)
Is gmane's gmane.comp.python.general allowing posts to go through
again? I had to revert to
Chris Green wrote:
> Jon Ribbens wrote:
> > On 2023-01-28, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > > On 2023-01-27 21:04:58 +, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> > >> It looks like you posted this question via Usenet. comp.lang.python is
> > >> essentially dead as a Usenet group. It exists, and gets NNTP versions
Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2023-01-28, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > On 2023-01-27 21:04:58 +, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> >> It looks like you posted this question via Usenet. comp.lang.python is
> >> essentially dead as a Usenet group. It exists, and gets NNTP versions
> >> of mail sent to the
On 2023-01-28, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2023-01-27 21:04:58 +, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> It looks like you posted this question via Usenet. comp.lang.python is
>> essentially dead as a Usenet group. It exists, and gets NNTP versions
>> of mail sent to the mailing list, but nothing posted
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 15:30:59 +0100, "Peter J. Holzer"
declaimed the following:
>On 2023-01-27 21:04:58 +, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> mutt...@dastardlyhq.com writes:
>>
>> > Hi
>>
>> It looks like you posted this question via Usenet. comp.lang.python is
>> essentially dead as a Usenet group.
19 matches
Mail list logo
