On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:51:18 -0800, rumours say that Michael Spencer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] might have written:
http://www.effbot.org/librarybook/marshal.htm
There's a typo in the text accompanying that example: img.get_magic() should
be
imp.get_magic().
The error is easy to explain: he's on
2006/1/29, Fabiano Sidler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
28 Jan 2006 22:02:45 -0800, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But if you want to make your life unnecessarily hard, you can hack the
compiler module just upstream from the creation of the code object --
alter the newCodeObject() method in
Fabiano Sidler wrote:
2006/1/29, Fabiano Sidler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
28 Jan 2006 22:02:45 -0800, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But if you want to make your life unnecessarily hard, you can hack the
compiler module just upstream from the creation of the code object --
alter the
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabiano Sidler wrote:
with pdb (which I'm surely not using as neatly as it could be). Or is
there any documentation on it I couldn't find?
The pysassem module is part of the compiler package:
Fabiano Sidler wrote:
I'm looking for a way to compile python source to bytecode instead of
code-objects. Is there a possibility to do that? The reason is: I want
to store pure bytecode with no additional data.
use marshal.
The second question is, therefore: How can I get the correct values
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Fabiano Sidler wrote:
I'm looking for a way to compile python source to bytecode instead of
code-objects. Is there a possibility to do that? The reason is: I want
to store pure bytecode with no additional data.
use marshal.
The second question is, therefore: How
[Fabiano Sidler]
I'm looking for a way to compile python source to bytecode instead of
code-objects. Is there a possibility to do that? The reason is: I want
to store pure bytecode with no additional data.
The second question is, therefore: How can I get the correct values
for a given
