On Jul 12, 10:06 am, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:27:32 -0700, castironpi wrote:
> > You want a random integer. Is there a range you want it in?
>
> > Past a certain point, you'll exceed the granularity of the random number
> > generator, a
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:27:32 -0700, castironpi wrote:
> You want a random integer. Is there a range you want it in?
>
> Past a certain point, you'll exceed the granularity of the random number
> generator, and some values in the range will never be generated.
You might want to produce an unboun
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:27:32 -0700, castironpi wrote:
> On Jul 11, 1:29 pm, WDC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Jul 11, 2:15 pm, Michiel Overtoom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > You wrote...
>> > >Is there a better way to do that besides doing this:
>>
>> > random.randint(0
On Jul 11, 1:29 pm, WDC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2:15 pm, Michiel Overtoom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You wrote...
> > >Is there a better way to do that besides doing this:
>
> > random.randint(0, 9)
> > >09657398671238769
>
> > Maybe this?
>
On Jul 11, 2:15 pm, Michiel Overtoom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You wrote...
> >Is there a better way to do that besides doing this:
>
> random.randint(0, 9)
> >09657398671238769
>
> Maybe this?
>
> random.randint(0, 9e16)
>
> --
> "The ability of the O
You wrote...
>Is there a better way to do that besides doing this:
>
random.randint(0, 9)
>09657398671238769
Maybe this?
random.randint(0, 9e16)
--
"The ability of the OSS process to collect and harness
the collective IQ of thousands of individuals
