On 2014-03-10, flebber flebber.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if a better programmer than I could explain if
the removal of OO features in golang really does offer an great
benefit over python.
An article I was reading ran through a brief overview of golang
in respect of OO features
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
On the whole though I think that the language is not yet mature enough
to be able to seriously compete with more established languages like
Python or Java.
Also, is there anything seriously lacking in Python, Java and C?
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:49 PM, flebber flebber.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if a better programmer than I could explain if the removal of
OO features in golang really does offer an great benefit over python.
An article I was reading ran through a brief overview of golang in respect
Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com:
The description of how Go structs work is accurate from what I know of
it, but I think the author goes astray in claiming that this is not
OOP.
Call it no-nonsense OOP. No wonder the color of the box was gray in
the example.
On the whole though I think that
Also, is there anything seriously lacking in Python, Java and C?
Marko
From their FAQ:
Go was born out of frustration with existing languages and environments for
systems programming. Programming had become too difficult and the choice of
languages was partly to blame. One had to choose
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
The author points out that nested structures can be made optional by
including a pointer to the structure instead of the structure itself.
Again you can do the exact same thing in C++; in OOP this is usually
described as a
Le lundi 10 mars 2014 05:49:20 UTC+1, flebber a écrit :
Why would a Python user change to go except for new and interesting?
Unicode
jmf
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com:
Java's MI simply doesn't exist (that's perfectly pure!), although
implementing interfaces can do a lot of it; but then you end up
duplicating piles of code (on the other hand, that's nothing new in
Java code).
Java 8 has default methods for interfaces. That
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com:
Java's MI simply doesn't exist (that's perfectly pure!), although
implementing interfaces can do a lot of it; but then you end up
duplicating piles of code (on the other hand, that's
On Monday, March 10, 2014 10:19:20 AM UTC+5:30, flebber wrote:
I was wondering if a better programmer than I could explain if the removal of
OO features in golang really does offer an great benefit over python.
That's a strange locution: You are suggesting that go had OOP and it was removed
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
